StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Panther vs Playwright

Panther vs Playwright

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Playwright
Playwright
Stacks612
Followers586
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K
Panther
Panther
Stacks6
Followers12
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks233

Panther vs Playwright: What are the differences?

Introduction

Below, you will find the key differences between Panther and Playwright, formatted as Markdown code that can be used in a website.

  1. Testing Support: Panther is primarily focused on functional and end-to-end testing of web applications with support for UI-driven testing, while Playwright is a versatile and flexible framework that allows for a range of testing scenarios, including UI-driven, API-driven, and performance testing.

  2. Browser Support: Panther supports only the Chrome browser while Playwright supports multiple browsers including Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit. This allows Playwright to run tests on different browsers for better cross-browser compatibility and coverage.

  3. Programming Languages: Panther is written in Python, so it provides a Pythonic API and is primarily used with Python projects. On the other hand, Playwright provides multi-language support for multiple programming languages including Python, JavaScript, and .NET. This makes Playwright more accessible for developers who prefer working with different languages.

  4. Automation Capabilities: Panther provides extensive automation capabilities with built-in features like form filling, screenshot capturing, and element interaction. Playwright also offers these features but goes a step further by supporting advanced automation scenarios like intercepting network calls, emulating mobile devices, and handling file uploads and downloads more seamlessly.

  5. Debugging and Logging: Panther offers basic debugging and logging capabilities, providing the ability to print logs and pause the execution of tests. Playwright, on the other hand, offers more advanced debugging and logging options, including support for debugging tests in the browser context and capturing network traffic logs for better troubleshooting.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Panther is a relatively new framework and has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Playwright. Playwright, being developed by Microsoft, has a larger community and is backed by a strong ecosystem. This means that Playwright has more active contributions, extensive documentation, and a broader range of resources available.

In Summary, Panther is primarily focused on functional testing, supports only the Chrome browser, and has a Pythonic API, while Playwright is a versatile framework that supports different testing scenarios, multiple browsers, and offers multi-language support with advanced automation capabilities, extensive debugging and logging options, and a larger community and ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Playwright
Playwright
Panther
Panther

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

It is a convenient standalone library to scrape websites and to run end-to-end tests using real browsers.

Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Executes the JavaScript code contained in webpages; Supports everything that Chrome (or Firefox) implements; Allows screenshots taking; Can wait for asynchronously loaded elements to show up; Lets you run your own JS code or XPath queries in the context of the loaded page; Supports custom Selenium server installations; Supports remote browser testing services including SauceLabs and BrowserStack
Statistics
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
GitHub Forks
233
Stacks
612
Stacks
6
Followers
586
Followers
12
Votes
81
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 7
    Promise based
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
Symfony
Symfony
JavaScript
JavaScript
Firefox
Firefox
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to Playwright, Panther?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

import.io

import.io

import.io is a free web-based platform that puts the power of the machine readable web in your hands. Using our tools you can create an API or crawl an entire website in a fraction of the time of traditional methods, no coding required.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana