Pika Pack vs Webpack: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. Configuration Overhead: Pika Pack requires very minimal configuration compared to Webpack, as it aims to simplify the process of bundling modern web applications without the need for complex setups. In contrast, Webpack is known for its steep learning curve and can be overwhelming for beginners due to its extensive configuration options.
2. Advanced Bundling Techniques: Webpack offers more advanced bundling techniques such as code splitting, tree shaking, and lazy loading out of the box. These features make Webpack a powerful tool for optimizing the performance of web applications. On the other hand, Pika Pack focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering a more straightforward approach to bundling without some of the advanced optimization features of Webpack.
3. ES Module Support: Pika Pack has built-in support for ES modules, allowing developers to leverage modern JavaScript syntax without the need for additional configuration. In contrast, Webpack requires additional plugins or configuration to handle ES modules, making it less convenient for projects that heavily rely on ES module imports.
4. Zero Configuration Entry Point: With Pika Pack, there is no need to specify an entry point in the configuration file, as it automatically detects the main file based on the package.json settings. This simplifies the setup process and reduces the chances of configuration errors. Webpack, on the other hand, requires developers to explicitly define an entry point in the configuration file.
5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Webpack has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, plugins, and loaders available for various use cases. This strong ecosystem makes it easier for developers to find solutions to common problems and customize their Webpack configurations. In comparison, Pika Pack is relatively new and may have limited community support and third-party plugins available.
6. Bundle Size Optimization: Webpack provides more robust tools and plugins for optimally reducing bundle sizes through techniques like minification, tree shaking, and code splitting. Pika Pack, while efficient in simplifying bundling tasks, may not offer the same level of optimization for reducing bundle sizes as Webpack does.

In Summary, Pika Pack focuses on simplicity and minimal configuration, while Webpack offers more advanced bundling techniques, a larger ecosystem, and better optimization capabilities for efficient web application development.