Playwright vs PreFlight

Overview

PreFlight

Stacks2

Followers20

Votes0

Playwright

Stacks613

Followers586

Votes81

GitHub Stars79.0K

Forks4.8K

Playwright vs PreFlight: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Playwright supports JavaScript, Python, and C# while PreFlight primarily focuses on JavaScript, providing extensive support for this language through its libraries and tools.
Browser Compatibility: Playwright offers cross-browser support for Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, enabling testing on multiple browsers, whereas Preflight has a strong emphasis on Chrome and its features, providing tailored solutions for this browser.
Testing Automation: Playwright is known for its robust testing automation capabilities, offering features such as parallel testing and integration with various testing frameworks, while PreFlight primarily focuses on manual testing and exploratory testing workflows.
Community Support: Playwright has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and offering support through forums and documentation, while PreFlight has a smaller community size but provides dedicated support through its official channels.
Integration with CI/CD Pipeline: Playwright seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps, facilitating continuous testing processes, whereas PreFlight may require additional configuration for seamless integration with certain CI/CD pipelines.
Performance Testing: Playwright includes features for performance testing, offering insights into page load times, network requests, and other performance metrics, while PreFlight may not have specialized tools for performance testing and optimization.

In Summary, Playwright and PreFlight differ in their supported programming languages, browser compatibility, automation capabilities, community support, integration with CI/CD pipelines, and performance testing features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

PreFlight	Playwright
Record tests while using your product and process the test then you can run them on all the popular browsers, across Windows & MacOS.	It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.
Zero coding knowledge required; Schedule tests; Test across browsers; Everyone can test automatically	Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 79.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 4.8K
Stacks 2	Stacks 613
Followers 20	Followers 586
Votes 0	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 15 Cross browser 11 Open source 9 Test Runner with Playwright/test 7 Well documented 7 Promise based Cons 12 Less help 3 Node based 2 Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
Travis CI Bitbucket GitLab CircleCI Slack	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PreFlight, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

Playwright vs PreFlight: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Playwright supports JavaScript, Python, and C# while PreFlight primarily focuses on JavaScript, providing extensive support for this language through its libraries and tools.
Browser Compatibility: Playwright offers cross-browser support for Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit, enabling testing on multiple browsers, whereas Preflight has a strong emphasis on Chrome and its features, providing tailored solutions for this browser.
Testing Automation: Playwright is known for its robust testing automation capabilities, offering features such as parallel testing and integration with various testing frameworks, while PreFlight primarily focuses on manual testing and exploratory testing workflows.
Community Support: Playwright has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and offering support through forums and documentation, while PreFlight has a smaller community size but provides dedicated support through its official channels.
Integration with CI/CD Pipeline: Playwright seamlessly integrates with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and Azure DevOps, facilitating continuous testing processes, whereas PreFlight may require additional configuration for seamless integration with certain CI/CD pipelines.
Performance Testing: Playwright includes features for performance testing, offering insights into page load times, network requests, and other performance metrics, while PreFlight may not have specialized tools for performance testing and optimization.

Playwright vs PreFlight

Overview