Pusher vs Radar

Overview

Pusher

Stacks618

Followers1.4K

Votes234

Radar

Stacks3

Followers17

Votes0

GitHub Stars220

Forks43

Pusher vs Radar: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing Pusher and Radar, it is crucial to understand the key differences between these two real-time data synchronization platforms. Both tools offer different features and functionalities that cater to various needs of developers and businesses.

1. Scalability and Data Storage: Pusher is known for its scalability, enabling real-time event broadcasting to millions of concurrent connections. On the other hand, Radar focuses on data storage and synchronization, allowing developers to manage and sync large volumes of data across devices efficiently.

2. Pricing Model: Pusher follows a pricing model based on the number of connections and total messages sent. In contrast, Radar offers a more flexible pricing structure, with different tiers based on the volume of data stored and synchronized, making it more cost-effective for businesses with varying needs.

3. Ease of Integration: Pusher provides libraries for various languages and frameworks, simplifying the integration process for developers. In comparison, Radar offers comprehensive SDKs and APIs, allowing for easy integration across different platforms and devices without compromising on functionality.

4. Real-time Data Processing: Pusher focuses on real-time event delivery, while Radar specializes in real-time data processing and analysis, enabling developers to make informed decisions based on real-time data insights.

5. Customization and Control: Pusher offers a high level of customization to fine-tune real-time messaging features, while Radar provides more control over data storage and synchronization mechanisms, allowing developers to tailor the platform to meet specific requirements.

6. Security and Compliance: When it comes to security and compliance, Pusher provides robust encryption and authentication mechanisms. On the other hand, Radar offers advanced security features and compliance certifications, making it a preferred choice for businesses handling sensitive data.

In Summary, Pusher and Radar differ in scalability, pricing models, integration ease, real-time data processing, customization, and security features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Pusher, Radar

Kenzie

Sep 30, 2021

Needs adviceon

.NET

AngularJS

MSSQL

I'm working on a project where I need to both send real-time updates for specific data sets, along with providing notifications to the users after long-running processes have been completed (SSE).

The project is using .NET Framework, AngularJS, & MSSQL. I understand that SignalR is nice as a polyfill for .NET and you can scale with a backplane, but I was wondering if there was a more efficient/effective technology for this?

36.1k views36.1k

Comments

Amit

Software Developer at Superpro.ai

Aug 20, 2021

Needs advice

We need to do lots of real-time communication like sending messages when someone request t to join an ongoing call then in real-time show the request to admin and if the admin accepted, then let the user join the call, change the user role from the audience to speaker so that they can also speak. We are planning to use WebSocket for it, but I think using some tools that already work on WebSocket is better so that we can focus on other things rather than implementing and managing WebSocket.

3.4k views3.4k

Comments

tauschjl

Apr 22, 2021

Needs advice

I am building an IoT application that will utilize connected air quality sensors to provide real-time indoor air quality in offices. I want to be able to share this data with a few different databases, etc.

Wondering if anyone has any advice on which real-time streaming API would be best for this sort of application, or even how I should think about it?

38.1k views38.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Pusher	Radar
Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.	Radar is built on top of engine.io, the next-generation backend for socket.io. It uses Redis for backend storage, though the assumption is that this is only for storing currently active data.
Easily build scalable in-app notifications, chat, realtime graphs, geotracking and more in your web & mobile apps with our hosted pub/sub messaging API.;Send programmable push notifications to iOS and Android devices with delivery and open rate tracking built in.;Easily add 1-1 and group Chat to your web & mobile apps. Presence, message storage, rich media, notifications, typing indicators and more.;Embed a realtime collaborative editor in your app in seconds to empower your users to do more, together.	More than just pub/sub: a resource-based API for presence, messaging and push notifications via a Javascript client library;Written in Javascript/Node.js, and uses engine.io (the new, low-level complement to socket.io);Backend to multiple front-facing servers;REST API for working with web apps that don't use Node (presently, rework in progress)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 220
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 43
Stacks 618	Stacks 3
Followers 1.4K	Followers 17
Votes 234	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 55 An easy way to give customers realtime features 40 Websockets 34 Simple 27 Easy to get started with 25 Free plan Cons 11 Costly	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Datadog Librato	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pusher, Radar?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

Pusher vs Radar: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In Summary, Pusher and Radar differ in scalability, pricing models, integration ease, real-time data processing, customization, and security features.

Pusher vs Radar

Overview