RabbitMQ vs XMPP

Overview

RabbitMQ

Stacks21.8K

Followers18.9K

Votes558

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks4.0K

XMPP

Stacks70

Followers138

Votes0

RabbitMQ vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

RabbitMQ and XMPP are both popular messaging protocols used for real-time communication. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

Protocol Nature: RabbitMQ is primarily a message broker that follows the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), which focuses on reliable message delivery and queuing capabilities. XMPP, on the other hand, is an Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol that supports instant messaging, presence information, and contact list maintenance.
Message Exchange Patterns: RabbitMQ supports various message exchange patterns, including publish-subscribe, request-response, and point-to-point messaging. XMPP is best suited for peer-to-peer communication and follows a client-server architecture for exchanging XML-formatted messages.
Ease of Integration: RabbitMQ offers a wide range of client libraries in different programming languages, making it easier to integrate with existing systems. On the contrary, XMPP has limited client library support, and integrating it with non-XMPP systems can be more challenging.
Scalability and Performance: RabbitMQ is known for its high scalability and can handle a large number of concurrent connections and messages efficiently. XMPP, being primarily designed for real-time communication, may encounter performance issues when dealing with a significant number of users and messages.
Brokers vs. Servers: RabbitMQ relies on message brokers to mediate the communication between producers and consumers. It provides advanced queuing features like message persistence, routing, and load balancing. XMPP, being a protocol, requires a server implementation that handles user authentication, presence management, and message routing.
Message Routing: RabbitMQ allows for flexible message routing through the use of exchange types like direct, topic, headers, and fanout exchanges. This allows messages to be selectively routed to specific queues. XMPP also supports entity-based addressing and routing but may lack the same level of flexibility as RabbitMQ.

In summary, RabbitMQ is a highly scalable message broker that excels in message queuing and delivery, while XMPP is a protocol designed for real-time communication with focus on instant messaging and presence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on RabbitMQ, XMPP

viradiya

Apr 12, 2020

Needs adviceon

AngularJS

ASP.NET Core

MSSQL

We are going to develop a microservices-based application. It consists of AngularJS, ASP.NET Core, and MSSQL.

We have 3 types of microservices. Emailservice, Filemanagementservice, Filevalidationservice

I am a beginner in microservices. But I have read about RabbitMQ, but come to know that there are Redis and Kafka also in the market. So, I want to know which is best.

933k views933k

Comments

André

Technology Manager at GS1 Portugal - Codipor

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET Core

Hello dear developers, our company is starting a new project for a new Web App, and we are currently designing the Architecture (we will be using .NET Core). We want to embark on something new, so we are thinking about migrating from a monolithic perspective to a microservices perspective. We wish to containerize those microservices and make them independent from each other. Is it the best way for microservices to communicate with each other via ESB, or is there a new way of doing this? Maybe complementing with an API Gateway? Can you recommend something else different than the two tools I provided?

We want something good for Cost/Benefit; performance should be high too (but not the primary constraint).

Thank you very much in advance :)

461k views461k

Comments

mediafinger

Feb 13, 2019

Reviewon

Kafka

RabbitMQ

The question for which Message Queue to use mentioned "availability, distributed, scalability, and monitoring". I don't think that this excludes many options already. I does not sound like you would take advantage of Kafka's strengths (replayability, based on an even sourcing architecture). You could pick one of the AMQP options.

I would recommend the RabbitMQ message broker, which not only implements the AMQP standard 0.9.1 (it can support 1.x or other protocols as well) but has also several very useful extensions built in. It ticks the boxes you mentioned and on top you will get a very flexible system, that allows you to build the architecture, pick the options and trade-offs that suite your case best.

For more information about RabbitMQ, please have a look at the linked markdown I assembled. The second half explains many configuration options. It also contains links to managed hosting and to libraries (though it is missing Python's - which should be Puka, I assume).

159k views159k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RabbitMQ	XMPP
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.	It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.
Robust messaging for applications;Easy to use;Runs on all major operating systems;Supports a huge number of developer platforms;Open source and commercially supported	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 13.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 21.8K	Stacks 70
Followers 18.9K	Followers 138
Votes 558	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 235 It's fast and it works with good metrics/monitoring 80 Ease of configuration 60 I like the admin interface 52 Easy to set-up and start with 22 Durable Cons 9 Too complicated cluster/HA config and management 6 Needs Erlang runtime. Need ops good with Erlang runtime 5 Configuration must be done first, not by your code 4 Slow	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Java Python JavaScript

What are some alternatives to RabbitMQ, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Related Comparisons

RabbitMQ vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction

RabbitMQ and XMPP are both popular messaging protocols used for real-time communication. While they serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

Protocol Nature: RabbitMQ is primarily a message broker that follows the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP), which focuses on reliable message delivery and queuing capabilities. XMPP, on the other hand, is an Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol that supports instant messaging, presence information, and contact list maintenance.
Message Exchange Patterns: RabbitMQ supports various message exchange patterns, including publish-subscribe, request-response, and point-to-point messaging. XMPP is best suited for peer-to-peer communication and follows a client-server architecture for exchanging XML-formatted messages.
Ease of Integration: RabbitMQ offers a wide range of client libraries in different programming languages, making it easier to integrate with existing systems. On the contrary, XMPP has limited client library support, and integrating it with non-XMPP systems can be more challenging.
Scalability and Performance: RabbitMQ is known for its high scalability and can handle a large number of concurrent connections and messages efficiently. XMPP, being primarily designed for real-time communication, may encounter performance issues when dealing with a significant number of users and messages.
Brokers vs. Servers: RabbitMQ relies on message brokers to mediate the communication between producers and consumers. It provides advanced queuing features like message persistence, routing, and load balancing. XMPP, being a protocol, requires a server implementation that handles user authentication, presence management, and message routing.
Message Routing: RabbitMQ allows for flexible message routing through the use of exchange types like direct, topic, headers, and fanout exchanges. This allows messages to be selectively routed to specific queues. XMPP also supports entity-based addressing and routing but may lack the same level of flexibility as RabbitMQ.

RabbitMQ vs XMPP

Overview

RabbitMQ vs XMPP: What are the differences?