StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Refit vs Soap UI

Refit vs Soap UI

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Soap UI
Soap UI
Stacks241
Followers157
Votes3
Refit
Refit
Stacks113
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks770

Refit vs Soap UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

This analysis will provide the key differences between Refit and Soap UI, two popular tools used for web service testing. The purpose is to identify and highlight the distinctive features of each tool for easy comparison.

  1. Integration Type: Refit allows for seamless integration with the ASP.NET Core, providing a strongly-typed HTTP client. On the other hand, Soap UI is specifically designed for testing SOAP and REST web services, offering more flexibility and support for various web service protocols.

  2. Ease of Use: Refit simplifies the process of creating HTTP clients, as it uses interfaces and attributes to generate the necessary HTTP request code, reducing the manual effort required. In contrast, Soap UI has a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features and advanced functionalities.

  3. Interface Design: Refit uses a code-first approach, allowing developers to generate API interfaces based on existing RESTful services. This makes it easier to maintain and update the client interface as changes are made to the server-side API. Soap UI, however, has a design-first approach, where the interface is created first and then implemented.

  4. Platform Compatibility: Refit is primarily designed for ASP.NET Core, making it ideal for developers working with the Microsoft technology stack. On the other hand, Soap UI is a Java-based tool that can be used on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux.

  5. Request Customization: Refit provides a high level of request customization with its built-in attribute system, enabling developers to define headers, query parameters, and authentication details easily. Soap UI offers extensive options for request customization, including support for custom scripts and assertions, making it a more versatile tool for complex testing scenarios.

  6. Reporting and Documentation: Refit lacks built-in reporting and documentation features, requiring developers to rely on additional tools or frameworks to generate comprehensive reports and documentation. Soap UI, on the other hand, offers rich reporting capabilities, including the ability to generate detailed HTML, PDF, or Excel reports directly from the tool.

In Summary, Refit and Soap UI differ in integration type, ease of use, interface design, platform compatibility, request customization options, and reporting/documentation capabilities. Depending on the specific requirements and preferences, developers can choose the tool that best suits their needs and project environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Soap UI
Soap UI
Refit
Refit

It is an open source functional Testing tool for API Testing. It supports multiple protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS, AMF and JDBC. It supports functional tests, security tests, and virtualization.

The automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, It turns your REST API into a live interface.

-
Dynamic headers; Authorization (Dynamic Headers redux)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
770
Stacks
241
Stacks
113
Followers
157
Followers
30
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Soap UI, Refit?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope