StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Reek vs Stylelint

Reek vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986
Reek
Reek
Stacks9
Followers22
Votes0
GitHub Stars4.1K
Forks282

Reek vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Reek and Stylelint:

  1. Purpose and Language Support: Reek is a Ruby code smell detector that aims to find patterns in Ruby code that could potentially indicate a problem. On the other hand, Stylelint is a linter that focuses on enforcing conventions and guidelines for CSS and Sass code. While Reek is specifically tailored for Ruby, Stylelint supports CSS, SCSS, and Less, making it versatile for front-end development.

  2. Rule Configuration: Reek comes with a predefined set of rules that detect common code smells in Ruby code, making it easier for developers to get started. In contrast, Stylelint offers a wide range of configurable rules that can be customized to suit the specific coding standards and preferences of a project. This flexibility allows developers to fine-tune Stylelint to meet their exact linting requirements.

  3. Integration with Build Tools: Reek can be integrated into Ruby projects using tools like Rake or Bundler, providing seamless linting within the Ruby development environment. Stylelint, on the other hand, can be easily integrated into build processes for web projects using tools like webpack, Gulp, or Grunt, ensuring consistent code quality checks during the build pipeline.

  4. Reporting and Fixing: Reek provides detailed reports on code smells found in Ruby code, helping developers identify and address potential issues efficiently. Stylelint also offers robust reporting capabilities but goes a step further by providing auto-fixing functionality for certain linting rules, streamlining the process of enforcing coding conventions.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Reek has a dedicated community of Ruby developers who contribute to its development and maintenance, ensuring ongoing support and updates. Stylelint, being a widely used tool in the front-end development community, benefits from a larger ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations, making it easier for developers to extend its functionality and customize their linting setup.

  6. Error Handling and Recovery: Reek primarily focuses on identifying code smells and potential issues in Ruby code, with limited support for error handling or recovery mechanisms. In comparison, Stylelint offers robust error handling features, allowing developers to specify how linting errors should be reported, suppressed, or fixed, enhancing the overall linting experience.

In Summary, Reek and Stylelint differ in their focus on code smells vs. coding conventions, language support, rule configuration, integration with build tools, reporting and fixing capabilities, and error handling mechanisms, catering to distinct needs in Ruby and front-end web development respectively.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Stylelint, Reek

Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Software Engineer

Aug 7, 2020

Review

you don't actually have to choose between these tools as they have vastly different purposes. i think its more a matter of understanding how to use them.

while eslint and stylelint are used to notify you about code quality issues, to guide you to write better code, prettier automatically handles code formatting (without notifying me). nothing else.

prettier and eslint both officially discourage using the eslint-plugin-prettier way, as these tools actually do very different things. autofixing with linters on watch isnt a great idea either. auto-fixing should only be done intentionally. you're not alone though, as a lot of devs set this up wrong.

i encourage you to think about what problem you're trying to solve and configure accordingly.

for my teams i set it up like this:

  • eslint, stylelint, prettier locally installed for cli use and ide support
  • eslint config prettier (code formatting rules are not eslints business, so dont warn me about it)
  • vscode workspace config: format on save
  • separate npm scripts for linting, and formatting
  • precommit hooks (husky)

so you can easily integrate with gulp. its just js after all ;)

159k views159k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Stylelint
Stylelint
Reek
Reek

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Reek is a tool that examines Ruby classes, modules, and methods and reports any Code Smells it finds.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Stars
4.1K
GitHub Forks
986
GitHub Forks
282
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
9
Followers
100
Followers
22
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Atom
Atom
Sublime Text
Sublime Text
Vim
Vim
TextMate
TextMate
Emacs
Emacs

What are some alternatives to Stylelint, Reek?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana