StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. RSMQ vs XMPP

RSMQ vs XMPP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

RSMQ
RSMQ
Stacks4
Followers87
Votes6
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks120
XMPP
XMPP
Stacks71
Followers138
Votes0

RSMQ vs XMPP: What are the differences?

Introduction:

RSMQ and XMPP are two popular messaging protocols utilized for real-time communication in web applications. Below are the key differences between RSMQ and XMPP.

1. Message Queuing vs. Instant Messaging: RSMQ (Redis Simple Message Queue) is primarily a message queuing system designed for handling asynchronous communication and task scheduling, while XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) is focused on instant messaging and presence notifications in real-time.

2. Protocol Implementation: RSMQ is built on top of Redis, a high-performance in-memory database, using simple data structures like lists and sets for message storage and retrieval. On the other hand, XMPP is a protocol developed specifically for real-time communication over the internet, providing advanced features like encryption, presence, and notifications.

3. Scalability and Performance: RSMQ offers high scalability and performance in scenarios where large volumes of messages need to be processed efficiently, making it suitable for applications with heavy message traffic. XMPP, although suitable for instant messaging applications, may face scalability challenges when dealing with massive message queues and concurrent connections.

4. Flexibility and Customization: RSMQ provides a simple and lightweight approach to message queuing, offering minimal configuration options and focusing on ease of use for developers. In contrast, XMPP offers extensive flexibility and customization capabilities, allowing developers to tailor the protocol to specific use cases and requirements through extensions and plugins.

5. Security Features: RSMQ lacks built-in security features such as encryption and authentication mechanisms, requiring developers to implement additional measures to secure message transmission and storage. XMPP, being a comprehensive messaging protocol, offers built-in security mechanisms like TLS encryption, SASL authentication, and end-to-end encryption for enhanced data protection.

6. Use Cases and Industry Adoption: RSMQ is commonly used in scenarios where simple message queuing and processing are required, such as background job handling, microservices communication, and distributed systems. In contrast, XMPP is widely adopted in instant messaging platforms, social networking applications, IoT communication, and collaborative environments due to its robust features and extensibility.

In Summary, RSMQ and XMPP differ in their focus on message queuing versus instant messaging, protocol implementation, scalability, flexibility, security features, and industry adoption.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

RSMQ
RSMQ
XMPP
XMPP

tl;dr: If you run a Redis server and currently use Amazon SQS or a similar message queue you might as well use this fast little replacement. Using a shared Redis server multiple Node.js processes can send / receive messages.

It is a set of open technologies for instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data.

Lightweight: Just Redis and ~500 lines of javascript.;Guaranteed delivery of a message to exactly one recipient within a messages visibility timeout.;Received messages that are not deleted will reappear after the visibility timeout.;Test coverage;Optional RESTful interface via rest-rsmq
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
120
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
4
Stacks
71
Followers
87
Followers
138
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Simple, does one thing well
  • 1
    Written in TypeScript
  • 1
    Written in Coffeescript
  • 1
    Backed by Redis
  • 1
    Comes with a visibility timeout feature similar to AWS
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Redis
Redis
Java
Java
Python
Python
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to RSMQ, XMPP?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase