Alternatives to scikit-image logo

Alternatives to scikit-image

OpenCV, MATLAB, SciPy, Cloudinary, and FFMPEG are the most popular alternatives and competitors to scikit-image.
124
120
+ 1
11

What is scikit-image and what are its top alternatives?

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.
scikit-image is a tool in the Image Processing and Management category of a tech stack.
scikit-image is an open source tool with 5K GitHub stars and 2K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to scikit-image's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to scikit-image

  • OpenCV
    OpenCV

    OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform. ...

  • MATLAB
    MATLAB

    Using MATLAB, you can analyze data, develop algorithms, and create models and applications. The language, tools, and built-in math functions enable you to explore multiple approaches and reach a solution faster than with spreadsheets or traditional programming languages, such as C/C++ or Java. ...

  • SciPy
    SciPy

    Python-based ecosystem of open-source software for mathematics, science, and engineering. It contains modules for optimization, linear algebra, integration, interpolation, special functions, FFT, signal and image processing, ODE solvers and other tasks common in science and engineering. ...

  • Cloudinary
    Cloudinary

    Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery. ...

  • FFMPEG
    FFMPEG

    The universal multimedia toolkit.

  • imgix
    imgix

    imgix is the leading visual media platform that businesses choose to improve user experience, website performance, and cost-saving. imgix offers robust image and video processing, global content delivery, and intelligent asset management. ...

  • ImageMagick
    ImageMagick

    It is a free and open-source software suite for displaying, converting, and editing raster image and vector image files. It can read and write images in a variety of formats (over 200) including PNG, JPEG, GIF, HEIC, TIFF, DPX, EXR, WebP, Postscript, PDF, and SVG. ...

  • GStreamer
    GStreamer

    It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing. ...

scikit-image alternatives & related posts

OpenCV logo

OpenCV

942
943
93
Open Source Computer Vision Library
942
943
+ 1
93
PROS OF OPENCV
  • 34
    Computer Vision
  • 17
    Open Source
  • 11
    Imaging
  • 9
    Face Detection
  • 9
    Machine Learning
  • 6
    Great community
  • 4
    Realtime Image Processing
  • 2
    Image Augmentation
  • 1
    Helping almost CV problem
CONS OF OPENCV
    Be the first to leave a con

    related OpenCV posts

    Shared insights
    on
    FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

    Hi Team,

    Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

    Thank you in Advance.

    See more
    MATLAB logo

    MATLAB

    755
    619
    33
    A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming
    755
    619
    + 1
    33
    PROS OF MATLAB
    • 18
      Simulink
    • 5
      Functions, statements, plots, directory navigation easy
    • 4
      Model based software development
    • 3
      S-Functions
    • 2
      REPL
    • 1
      Simple variabel control
    • 1
      Solve invertible matrix
    CONS OF MATLAB
    • 1
      Parameter-value pairs syntax to pass arguments clunky
    • 0
      Does not support named function arguments
    • 0
      Doesn't allow unpacking tuples/arguments lists with *

    related MATLAB posts

    SciPy logo

    SciPy

    538
    153
    0
    Scientific Computing Tools for Python
    538
    153
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF SCIPY
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF SCIPY
        Be the first to leave a con

        related SciPy posts

        Cloudinary logo

        Cloudinary

        525
        536
        179
        An end-to-end image & video management solution for your web and mobile applications
        525
        536
        + 1
        179
        PROS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 38
          Easy setup
        • 30
          Fast image delivery
        • 26
          Vast array of image manipulation capabilities
        • 21
          Free tier
        • 11
          Heroku add-on
        • 9
          Reduce development costs
        • 7
          Amazing support
        • 6
          Great libraries for all languages
        • 6
          Heroku plugin
        • 6
          Virtually limitless scale
        • 5
          Easy to integrate with Rails
        • 4
          Cheap
        • 3
          Shot setup time
        • 3
          Very easy setup
        • 2
          Solves alot of image problems.
        • 1
          Best in the market and includes free plan
        • 1
          Extremely generous free pricing tier
        • 0
          Fast image delivery, vast array
        CONS OF CLOUDINARY
        • 3
          Paid plan is expensive

        related Cloudinary posts

        FFMPEG logo

        FFMPEG

        294
        215
        4
        The universal multimedia toolkit.
        294
        215
        + 1
        4
        PROS OF FFMPEG
        • 4
          Open Source
        CONS OF FFMPEG
          Be the first to leave a con

          related FFMPEG posts

          Shared insights
          on
          FFMPEGFFMPEGOpenCVOpenCV

          Hi Team,

          Could you please suggest which one need to be used in between OpenCV and FFMPEG.

          Thank you in Advance.

          See more
          imgix logo

          imgix

          200
          293
          155
          Real-time image resizing service and CDN
          200
          293
          + 1
          155
          PROS OF IMGIX
          • 26
            Image processing on demand
          • 23
            Easy setup
          • 17
            Smart Cropping
          • 17
            Reduce Development Costs
          • 14
            Efficient
          • 11
            Insanely Fast
          • 10
            Filters, resizing, blur and more as url parameters
          • 9
            Easy to understand pricing
          • 8
            Professional Features and Options
          • 5
            Excellent Face Detection
          • 5
            Lightyears better than ImageMagick
          • 4
            S3 as source
          • 3
            Scales to your company's needs
          • 3
            Great for Dynamic Compositing
          CONS OF IMGIX
            Be the first to leave a con

            related imgix posts

            Mountain/ \Ash

            Platform Update: we’ve been using the Performance Test tool provided by KeyCDN for a long time in combination with Pingdom's similar tool and the #WebpageTest and #GoogleInsight - we decided to test out KeyCDN for static asset hosting. The results for the endpoints were superfast - almost 200% faster than CloudFlare in some tests and 370% faster than imgix . So we’ve moved Washington Brown from imgix for hosting theme images, to KeyCDN for hosting all images and static assets (Font, CSS & JS). There’s a few things that we like about “Key” apart from saving $6 a month on the monthly minimum spend ($4 vs $10 for imgix). Key allow for a custom CNAME (no more advertising imgix.com in domain requests and possible SEO improvements - and easier to swap to another host down the track). Key allows JPEG/WebP image requests based on clients ‘accept’ http headers - imgix required a ?auto=format query string on each image resource request - which can break some caches. Key allows for explicitly denying cookies to be set on a zone/domain; cookies are a big strain on limited upload bandwidth so to be able to force these off is great - Cloudflare adds a cookie to every header… for “performance reasons”… but remember “if you’re getting a product something for free…”

            See more
            Mountain/ \Ash

            In mid-2018 we made a big push for speed on the site. The site, running on PHP, was taking about 7 seconds to load. The site had already been running through CloudFlare for some time but on a shared host in Sydney (which is also where most of the customers are). We found when developing the @TuffTruck site that DigitalOcean was fast - and even though it's located overseas, we still found it 2 seconds faster for Australian users. We found that some Wordpress plugins were really slowing the TTFB - with all plugins off, Wordpress would save respond 1.5-2 seconds faster. With a on/off step through of each plugin we found 2 plugins by Ontraport (a CRM type service that some forms we populating) was the main culprit. Out it went and we built our own WP plugin to do push the data to Ontraport only when required. With the TTFB acceptable, we moved on to getting the completed page load time down. Turning on CloudFlare 's HTML/CSS/JS minifications & Rocket Loader we could get our group of test pages, including the homepage, loading [in full] in just over 2 seconds. We then moved images off to imgix and put the CSS, JS and Fonts onto a mirrored subdomain (so that cookies weren't exchanged), but this only shaved about another 0.2 seconds off. We are keeping it running for the moment, but the $10 minimum a month for imgix is hardly worth it (this would be change if new images were going up all the time and needed processing). The client is overly happy with the ~70% improvement and has already seen the site move up the ranks of Google's SERP and bring down their PPC costs. AND all the new hosting providers still come in at half the price of the previous Sydney hosting service. We have a few ideas that we are testing on our staging site and will roll these out soon.

            See more
            ImageMagick logo

            ImageMagick

            72
            82
            0
            A software suite to create, edit, compose, or convert bitmap images
            72
            82
            + 1
            0
            PROS OF IMAGEMAGICK
              Be the first to leave a pro
              CONS OF IMAGEMAGICK
                Be the first to leave a con

                related ImageMagick posts

                GStreamer logo

                GStreamer

                33
                61
                4
                Open source multimedia framework
                33
                61
                + 1
                4
                PROS OF GSTREAMER
                • 2
                  Ease of use
                • 1
                  Cross Platform
                • 1
                  Open Source
                CONS OF GSTREAMER
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related GStreamer posts