StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Realtime Backend API
  5. Serialized vs Supabase

Serialized vs Supabase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Supabase
Supabase
Stacks529
Followers455
Votes29
GitHub Stars91.8K
Forks10.5K
Serialized
Serialized
Stacks1
Followers2
Votes0

Serialized vs Supabase: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Serialized and Supabase. Serialized is a cloud-based system that allows developers to build event-driven applications, while Supabase is an open-source Firebase alternative that simplifies the process of building and maintaining backend services.

1. Scalability: Serialized offers a highly scalable infrastructure that can handle a large number of events and scale up or down based on demand. On the other hand, Supabase provides scalability through horizontal scaling and load balancing, allowing applications to handle heavy traffic efficiently.

2. Event Sourcing: Serialized focuses on event sourcing, which means that all changes to an application's state are captured as a sequence of events. These events are immutable and can be used to build and rebuild the application's state at any point in time. Supabase, on the other hand, does not emphasize event sourcing but rather provides traditional database functionality with real-time updates.

3. Data Modeling: Serialized offers a rich set of tools and features for data modeling, including aggregates, projections, and projections with custom queries. This allows developers to design and structure their data in a way that best fits their application's needs. Supabase, on the other hand, follows a more traditional relational database model with tables, columns, and relationships.

4. Integration: Serialized provides easy integration with other systems through its powerful APIs and plugins. It supports various event storage options and can integrate with external data sources. Supabase, on the other hand, offers seamless integration with popular frontend frameworks like React, Next.js, and Vue.js, as well as third-party tools like Auth0 and Hasura.

5. Pricing: Serialized follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where developers pay for the resources they use. The cost is calculated based on the number of events processed and storage used. Supabase, on the other hand, provides a free tier for developers to get started, with additional pricing based on the number of authenticated users and storage used.

6. Authentication and Access Control: Serialized offers flexible authentication and access control options, allowing developers to define fine-grained permissions for different users and roles. Supabase also provides authentication and access control features, allowing developers to secure their applications and manage user access based on roles and permissions.

In summary, Serialized focuses on event-driven architecture and provides scalability, powerful data modeling, and flexible integrations, while Supabase simplifies backend development with real-time updates, seamless integrations, and user-friendly pricing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Supabase
Supabase
Serialized
Serialized

Supabase is currently in early-Alpha .It is an open-source Firebase alternative. It adds realtime and RESTful APIs to your PostgreSQL database without a single line of code.

Complete platform for Event Sourcing & CQRS. Build fast, scalable and secure event-driven systems using any language. No more managing storage infrastructure or databases.

Full Postgres database; Instant RESTful API; Realtime notifications via websockets; APIs always in sync with your schema; Custom API docs for your schema; Built-in security & monitoring
Event Sourcing API;Projections API;Reactions API;Event Feed API;Mutli-Tenancy Support;Fully Managed;Web Console Application
Statistics
GitHub Stars
91.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
10.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
529
Stacks
1
Followers
455
Followers
2
Votes
29
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Relational Database
  • 6
    Self hosting
  • 3
    Postgres hosting
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Open source
Cons
  • 0
    No cons
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Streamlit
Streamlit
CodeSandbox
CodeSandbox
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Arengu
Arengu
Stream
Stream
PostgREST
PostgREST
Replibyte
Replibyte
Directus
Directus
Trevor.io
Trevor.io
Prisma
Prisma
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
C#
C#
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Supabase, Serialized?

Firebase

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase