StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Uploads
  5. Shrine vs Uppy

Shrine vs Uppy

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Shrine
Shrine
Stacks13
Followers23
Votes0
Uppy
Uppy
Stacks92
Followers142
Votes6
GitHub Stars30.4K
Forks2.1K

Shrine vs Uppy: What are the differences?

# Differences between Shrine and Uppy

Shrine and Uppy are both popular web-based libraries for handling file uploads, but there are key differences between the two that make them suitable for different use cases.

1. **Architecture**: Shrine follows a modular architecture, giving developers the flexibility to use only the components they need, while Uppy is a monolithic library with all features bundled together.
2. **Client-Side Processing**: Uppy focuses on client-side processing, allowing users to manipulate files before uploading, while Shrine primarily handles server-side processing.
3. **Upload Storage**: Shrine supports a wide range of upload storage options, including cloud services like AWS and Google Cloud, whereas Uppy does not provide built-in support for as many storage solutions.
4. **Customizability**: Shrine offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the upload process to their specific requirements, whereas Uppy provides a more streamlined approach with fewer customization possibilities.
5. **Community and Support**: Shrine has a dedicated community and robust documentation, making it easier to find help and resources, while Uppy may have a smaller community and less comprehensive documentation. 

In Summary, Shrine and Uppy differ in architecture, client-side processing, upload storage options, customizability, and community support, making them suitable for different use cases based on developers' specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Shrine
Shrine
Uppy
Uppy

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

-
React (Native) support (planned);ES6;Modular setup;Drag & Drop;Aware of encoding/processing; Copy & Paste; Encoding; Resumable File Uploads; Themable, with a beautiful default;Webcam;Import from Dropbox; Import from Google Drive; Import from Instagram
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
13
Stacks
92
Followers
23
Followers
142
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Copy & Paste support
  • 3
    Open Source & Self Hosted
Cons
  • 1
    Takes time to configure
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Dropbox
Dropbox
Transloadit
Transloadit
Google Drive
Google Drive

What are some alternatives to Shrine, Uppy?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Bytescale

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Filestack

Filestack

Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.

CarrierWave

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

FilePond

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

tus.io

tus.io

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

CameraTag

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

Flatfile

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase