SocketCluster vs uWebSockets

Overview

SocketCluster

Stacks47

Followers168

Votes47

GitHub Stars6.2K

Forks322

uWebSockets

Stacks16

Followers52

Votes0

GitHub Stars18.5K

Forks1.8K

SocketCluster vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Introduction:

SocketCluster and uWebSockets are both popular options for building real-time applications, but they have some key differences. Here, we will explore six specific differences between these two technologies and provide a concise summary.

1. Programming Language Support: SocketCluster is primarily designed for Node.js and supports JavaScript as the main programming language. On the other hand, uWebSockets is a lightweight WebSockets library that supports multiple programming languages including C++, JavaScript, and Python.

2. Scalability and Cluster Management: SocketCluster includes built-in scalability and cluster management features, allowing it to scale horizontally across multiple CPUs and servers. uWebSockets, on the other hand, is a lower-level library focused on providing efficient WebSockets support and does not include built-in cluster management.

3. Middleware Support: SocketCluster offers middleware support, which enables developers to easily add custom functionality to the server-side application stack. This allows for implementing features like authentication, logging, and data validation. uWebSockets, being a lower-level library, does not provide built-in middleware support, requiring developers to implement such features manually.

4. Ease of Use and Developer Experience: SocketCluster abstracts away many complexities of building real-time applications, providing a higher level of abstraction and simpler API. It offers features like automatic session management, pub/sub, and remote procedure calls (RPCs), making it easier for developers to build real-time features. uWebSockets, on the other hand, is a more low-level library, requiring developers to handle more of the implementation details themselves.

5. Extensibility and Customization: SocketCluster provides various ways to extend and customize its functionality, such as by building custom WebSocket event handlers and using middleware. uWebSockets also offers customization options, but being a lower-level library, it requires more manual work to implement advanced features.

6. Ecosystem and Community: SocketCluster has a larger and more active community compared to uWebSockets. This means that developers using SocketCluster can benefit from a larger pool of resources, support, and community-contributed plugins and extensions.

In summary, SocketCluster and uWebSockets differ in terms of programming language support, scalability and cluster management, middleware support, ease of use and developer experience, extensibility and customization options, as well as the size and activity of their respective communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on SocketCluster, uWebSockets

Anil

Mar 7, 2020

Needs advice

I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this? I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?I want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real-time chatting, for that, I have to draw a UML and ufd diagram flow then I have to implement it in my code, my stack is node js, android, express, MongoDB, Redis. how can I do this?i want to add uWebSockets.js in my application for real time chatting, for that i have to draw a uml and ufd diagram flow then i have to implement it in my code , my stack is node js , android , express , mongoDb, redis . how can i do a this?

46.7k views46.7k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

SocketCluster	uWebSockets
SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.	It is a simple to use yet thoroughly optimized implementation of HTTP and WebSockets. It comes with built-in pub/sub support, HTTP routing, TLS 1.3, IPv6, permessage-deflate and is battle tested as one of the most popular implementations, reaching many end-users daily.
Resilient on both the client and backend - Process crashes, lost connections and other failures are handled seamlessly.;Scales linearly as you add more CPU cores and workers (assuming a decent OS) - Tested with up to 16 cores.;Also designed to scale horizontally across multiple machines. See sc-redis sample.	HTTP and Websockets;Built-in pub/sub support;HTTP routing
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.2K	GitHub Stars 18.5K
GitHub Forks 322	GitHub Forks 1.8K
Stacks 47	Stacks 16
Followers 168	Followers 52
Votes 47	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 12 Cluster mode is awesome 8 WebSockets 7 Scalability 4 Security 4 JWT based Authentication	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js	C++ Windows Linux macOS

What are some alternatives to SocketCluster, uWebSockets?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

8base

A cloud service designed to power enterprise-grade web and mobile applications that require support for large numbers of users, complex data and transactional requirements, comprehensive role-based security and a modern look-and-feel.

Related Comparisons

SocketCluster vs uWebSockets: What are the differences?

Introduction:

SocketCluster vs uWebSockets

Overview