StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Cms Tools
  5. SonarLint vs SwiftLint

SonarLint vs SwiftLint

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SwiftLint
SwiftLint
Stacks156
Followers105
Votes0
GitHub Stars19.3K
Forks2.3K
SonarLint
SonarLint
Stacks175
Followers352
Votes16

SonarLint vs SwiftLint: What are the differences?

Introduction

SonarLint and SwiftLint are both widely used static code analysis tools in the development community. While they have similar goals of identifying and reporting code issues, there are some key differences between the two that developers should be aware of.

  1. Integration: SonarLint is designed to integrate with the SonarQube platform, while SwiftLint is a standalone linter primarily used for Swift code. SonarLint provides a more comprehensive analysis solution when used with SonarQube, which offers additional features like code quality and security tracking.

  2. Customizability: SwiftLint provides extensive customizability options, allowing developers to define their own set of rules and configurations. SonarLint, on the other hand, offers a predefined set of rules and configurations based on the language being analyzed. While limited in customization, SonarLint offers a convenient out-of-the-box solution.

  3. Rule Sets: SonarLint offers a broader range of rule sets compared to SwiftLint. This makes SonarLint a more suitable choice for projects where a comprehensive set of rules is necessary for ensuring code quality and adherence to best practices.

  4. Language Support: SwiftLint is specifically built for analyzing Swift code, while SonarLint supports a wider range of programming languages. If you are working on a project that involves multiple languages, SonarLint may be a more suitable choice.

  5. IDE Integration: SonarLint has better integration with IDEs like IntelliJ, Eclipse, and Visual Studio. It provides real-time feedback directly in the IDE, allowing developers to spot and fix code issues as they write code. SwiftLint, on the other hand, lacks this level of integration and primarily operates as a command-line tool.

  6. Community Support: SwiftLint benefits from a strong and active community, with continuous updates and contributions from developers. This ensures that the tool remains up-to-date and supports the latest Swift language features. SonarLint also has a community, but it may not be as prominent as the SwiftLint community.

In Summary, SonarLint is more suitable for projects that require integration with SonarQube, while SwiftLint offers greater customizability and is specific to analyzing Swift code. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of the project and the programming languages involved.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SwiftLint
SwiftLint
SonarLint
SonarLint

It is a tool to enforce Swift style and conventions, loosely based on GitHub's Swift Style Guide.It hooks into Clang and SourceKit to use the AST representation of your source files for more accurate results.

It is an IDE extension that helps you detect and fix quality issues as you write code. Like a spell checker, it squiggles flaws so that they can be fixed before committing code.

automatically correct certain violations; supports nesting configuration files
Bug detection;Instant feedback;Know what to do;Learn from your mistakes;Uncover old issues
Statistics
GitHub Stars
19.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
156
Stacks
175
Followers
105
Followers
352
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 13
    IDE Integration
  • 3
    Free
Cons
  • 3
    Not Very User Friendly
  • 3
    Non contextual warnings
Integrations
Xcode
Xcode
Jenkins
Jenkins
macOS
macOS
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
Visual Studio Code
Visual Studio Code
Eclipse
Eclipse
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA

What are some alternatives to SwiftLint, SonarLint?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana