StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. ABP Commercial vs ASP.NET Zero

ABP Commercial vs ASP.NET Zero

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero
Stacks28
Followers77
Votes41
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial
Stacks21
Followers63
Votes31

ABP Commercial vs ASP.NET Zero: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between ABP Commercial and ASP.NET Zero. Both ABP Commercial and ASP.NET Zero are popular frameworks used for developing web applications, but they have some distinct differences that are important to consider when choosing between them.

  1. Language and Technology Stack: ABP Commercial utilizes the ASP.NET Core framework, which is based on C# and supports cross-platform development. On the other hand, ASP.NET Zero is built on top of the ASP.NET MVC framework, which uses C# and is primarily focused on Windows-based development.

  2. Architecture and Framework: ABP Commercial follows a modular and layered architecture, making it highly modular and extensible. It provides a set of predefined modules that can be easily customized and extended. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, follows a more monolithic architecture, where all the features are bundled in a single project.

  3. Pricing and Licensing: ABP Commercial is a commercial framework that requires a paid license for using its advanced features and getting official support. ASP.NET Zero, on the other hand, follows an open-source approach and provides a free community edition for non-commercial use, with optional premium features available through a paid license.

  4. Development Speed and Productivity: ABP Commercial provides a set of pre-built application templates and scaffolding tools that enable rapid development and reduces the time needed for setting up and configuring a new project. ASP.NET Zero also provides similar features, but it may require more initial setup and configuration compared to ABP Commercial.

  5. Customization and Flexibility: ABP Commercial offers a high level of customization and flexibility, allowing developers to easily modify and extend the framework according to their specific requirements. ASP.NET Zero also supports customization but to a lesser extent, as it has a more opinionated approach to development.

  6. Community and Support: ABP Commercial has a dedicated support team and provides official documentation, tutorials, and forums for users to get help and guidance. ASP.NET Zero has a strong community support, with a large number of users and developers actively contributing to the framework through forums, blogs, and open-source projects.

In summary, the key differences between ABP Commercial and ASP.NET Zero lie in the language and technology stack used, architectural approach, pricing and licensing model, development speed and productivity, customization and flexibility options, and the level of community and support available. These factors should be considered when choosing the right framework for your web application development needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ASP.NET Zero
ASP.NET Zero
ABP Commercial
ABP Commercial

ASP.NET Zero is a starting point for new web applications with modern UI and SOLID architecture. It saves time by providing common application requirements with pre-built modules/pages as a Visual Studio solution (with full source code).

It is a complete web development platform based on the ABP framework. It provides pre-built application modules, rapid application development tooling, professional UI themes, premium support and more.

Multi-Tenancy; Authentication & Authorization; Rapid Application Development; Http Api; Mobile Application; Setting Management; Solid Architecture; Based On Strong Frameworks; Based On Metronic Theme; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Automated Testing
ABP CLI; Modularity; Multi-Tenancy; Bootstrap Tag Helpers; Dynamic Forms; Authentication & Authorization; Cross-Cutting Concerns; Bundling & Minification; Virtual File System; Theming; Domain-Driven Design Infrastructure; Auto Rest Apis; Dynamic Client Proxies; Distributed Event Bus With RabbitMQ Integration; Test Infrastructure; Audit Logging & Entity Histories; Object To Object Mapping; Email & Sms Abstractions With Templating Support; Aspect-Oriented Programming; Dependency Injection By Conventions; Data Filtering
Statistics
Stacks
28
Stacks
21
Followers
77
Followers
63
Votes
41
Votes
31
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Starting point for web applications
  • 4
    Clean & SOLID architecture
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 3
    Premium forum support
  • 3
    Pre-built functionalities
Pros
  • 4
    Development productivity tools
  • 4
    Rapid development
  • 4
    Supports micro-service architecture
  • 3
    Easy to integrate
  • 3
    Complete web development platform
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
jQuery
jQuery
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
npm
npm
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
SignalR
SignalR
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
NuGet
NuGet
Blazor
Blazor
.NET Core
.NET Core
MongoDB
MongoDB
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Hangfire
Hangfire
Chartbrew
Chartbrew

What are some alternatives to ASP.NET Zero, ABP Commercial?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase