Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ

188
220
+ 1
51
Hutch
Hutch

3
5
+ 1
0
Add tool

ActiveMQ vs Hutch: What are the differences?

Developers describe ActiveMQ as "A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client". Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License. On the other hand, Hutch is detailed as "Inter-Service Communication with RabbitMQ". Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.

ActiveMQ and Hutch belong to "Message Queue" category of the tech stack.

ActiveMQ and Hutch are both open source tools. It seems that ActiveMQ with 1.5K GitHub stars and 1.05K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Hutch with 712 GitHub stars and 103 GitHub forks.

What is ActiveMQ?

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

What is Hutch?

Hutch is a Ruby library for enabling asynchronous inter-service communication in a service-oriented architecture, using RabbitMQ.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose ActiveMQ?
Why do developers choose Hutch?
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use ActiveMQ?
        What companies use Hutch?

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with ActiveMQ?
        What tools integrate with Hutch?
        What are some alternatives to ActiveMQ and Hutch?
        RabbitMQ
        RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
        Kafka
        Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
        Apollo
        Build a universal GraphQL API on top of your existing REST APIs, so you can ship new application features fast without waiting on backend changes.
        Amazon SQS
        Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
        Celery
        Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
        See all alternatives
        Decisions about ActiveMQ and Hutch
        No stack decisions found
        Interest over time
        Reviews of ActiveMQ and Hutch
        No reviews found
        How developers use ActiveMQ and Hutch
        Avatar of Casey Smith
        Casey Smith uses ActiveMQActiveMQ

        Remote broker and local client for incoming data feeds. Local broker for republishing data feeds to other systems.

        How much does ActiveMQ cost?
        How much does Hutch cost?
        Pricing unavailable
        Pricing unavailable
        News about ActiveMQ
        More news
        News about Hutch
        More news