Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ActiveMQ vs Sandglass: What are the differences?
What is ActiveMQ? A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client. Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
What is Sandglass? Distributed, scalable, persistent time-sorted message queue. A distributed, horizontally scalable, persistent, time ordered message queue. Developed to support asynchronous tasks and message scheduling which makes it suitable for usage as a task queue.
ActiveMQ and Sandglass can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.
ActiveMQ and Sandglass are both open source tools. Sandglass with 1.52K GitHub stars and 40 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than ActiveMQ with 1.5K GitHub stars and 1.05K GitHub forks.
Pros of ActiveMQ
- Easy to use18
- Open source14
- Efficient13
- JMS compliant10
- High Availability6
- Scalable5
- Distributed Network of brokers3
- Persistence3
- Support XA (distributed transactions)3
- Docker delievery1
- Highly configurable1
- RabbitMQ0
Pros of Sandglass
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ActiveMQ
- ONLY Vertically Scalable1
- Support1
- Low resilience to exceptions and interruptions1
- Difficult to scale1
Cons of Sandglass
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is ActiveMQ?
What is Sandglass?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use ActiveMQ?
What companies use Sandglass?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+35