Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!


+ 1

+ 1
Add tool

AdonisJS vs Sails.js: What are the differences?

Key differences between AdonisJS and Sails.js

AdonisJS and Sails.js are both Node.js web frameworks that simplify the development of scalable web applications. However, there are key differences between the two frameworks that developers should consider when choosing which one to use for their projects.

  1. Architecture: AdonisJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which provides a clear separation of concerns and promotes code organization. On the other hand, Sails.js follows the convention-over-configuration approach, allowing developers to focus on writing application code without worrying about complex configurations.

  2. ORM: AdonisJS uses its own ORM called Lucid, which is a query builder and database adapter. It provides a fluent and intuitive way to interact with databases. Sails.js, on the other hand, supports multiple ORMs like Waterline and Sequelize, giving developers the flexibility to choose the one that best suits their needs.

  3. WebSocket support: AdonisJS has built-in support for WebSockets through the use of its own WebSocket server implementation. This makes it easy to build real-time applications that require bidirectional communication. Sails.js also supports WebSockets, but it requires additional configuration and the use of external libraries.

  4. Community and ecosystem: AdonisJS has a smaller but growing community compared to Sails.js. It has an active core team that maintains the framework and regularly releases updates. Sails.js, on the other hand, has a larger community and a more mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and libraries available.

  5. Learning curve: AdonisJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Sails.js due to its more opinionated approach and the use of its own ORM. Developers familiar with MVC frameworks may find it easier to pick up AdonisJS. Sails.js, on the other hand, has a shallower learning curve and is more beginner-friendly, thanks to its convention-over-configuration approach.

  6. Performance: AdonisJS is known for its high performance, thanks to its efficient database query builder and WebSocket server implementation. Sails.js, on the other hand, may have slightly lower performance due to its ORM abstraction layer and the need for additional configurations.

In summary, AdonisJS and Sails.js have different architectural approaches, ORM choices, WebSocket support, community size, learning curves, and performance characteristics. Developers should consider these key differences when choosing between the two frameworks for their projects.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of AdonisJS
Pros of Sails.js
  • 25
    Laravel like
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 23
  • 21
    Beautiful code
  • 10
    ORM Mapper
  • 6
    Service Providers
  • 5
    Fast development
  • 4
    Easy to understand documentation
  • 2
  • 1
    Schema migrations
  • 1
    Ace command-line tool
  • 49
    Data-driven apis
  • 47
    Waterline ORM
  • 37
  • 32
    Easy rest
  • 25
  • 21
    Open source
  • 19
    Service-oriented architecture
  • 18
  • 10
    Convension over configuration
  • 9
    Rails-like asset pipeline
  • 9
    Node machines and machinepacks
  • 7
    Easy route/controller generation
  • 6
    Ruby on Rails basic stuff for JS devs
  • 3
    CLI for scaffolding project pieces
  • 3
    WebSocket support
  • 1
    Supportive community

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AdonisJS
Cons of Sails.js
  • 5
    Small community
  • 1
    Poor documentation
  • 5
    Waterline ORM
  • 4
    Defaults to VueJS
  • 0
    Standard MVC

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AdonisJS?

It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.

What is Sails.js?

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AdonisJS?
What companies use Sails.js?
See which teams inside your own company are using AdonisJS or Sails.js.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AdonisJS?
What tools integrate with Sails.js?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to AdonisJS and Sails.js?
Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming). Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.
It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.
Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.
A highly-extensible, open-source Node.js framework that enables you to create dynamic end-to-end REST APIs with little or no coding. Connect to multiple data sources, write business logic in Node.js, glue on top of your existing services and data, connect using JS, iOS & Android SDKs.
Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
See all alternatives