AEM vs Liferay

Overview

Liferay

Stacks299

Followers64

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.2K

Forks3.7K

AEM

Stacks108

Followers134

Votes0

AEM vs Liferay: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of Content Management Systems (CMS), Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Liferay are two popular choices. Here, we will discuss the key differences between AEM and Liferay.

Architecture: AEM follows a Java-based architecture, while Liferay is built on Java but also supports various other programming languages like PHP and Ruby. AEM uses Apache Sling as its web application framework, while Liferay uses its own MVC framework called Liferay MVC.
Target Audience: AEM is more commonly used by enterprise-level businesses due to its robust features and scalability, whereas Liferay is often preferred by smaller businesses or organizations looking for a versatile and cost-effective CMS solution.
Customization: AEM provides extensive customization options with its flexible and modular architecture, allowing developers to create tailored solutions for specific business needs. On the other hand, Liferay offers a range of out-of-the-box features and extensions, making it easier for non-technical users to set up and manage their websites.
Licensing: AEM is a proprietary CMS developed by Adobe, which means users have to pay licensing fees to use the software. In contrast, Liferay is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses with limited resources.
Community Support: Liferay has a strong and active community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement, providing users with a wealth of resources, plugins, and support. Although AEM also has a community of users, it is not as extensive as Liferay's community.
Ease of Use: AEM is known for its steep learning curve and complex user interface, making it more challenging for beginners to navigate. In comparison, Liferay has a more intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users of all skill levels to manage their websites efficiently.

In Summary, AEM and Liferay differ in terms of architecture, target audience, customization options, licensing, community support, and ease of use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Liferay	AEM
It makes software that helps companies create digital experiences on web, mobile and connected devices.	It is a web-based client-server system for building, managing and deploying commercial websites and related services. It combines a number of infrastructure-level and application-level functions into a single integrated package.
Tailored solutions built fast, secure, and connected on one platform; Increase Online Revenue with B2B Commerce; Create Simple, Effective Self-Service Experiences; Drive Employee Productivity; Unify Disparate Systems	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 2.2K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 3.7K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 299	Stacks 108
Followers 64	Followers 134
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to Liferay, AEM?

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

eXo Platform

eXo Platform is a digital workplace solution that allows businesses to connect, engage, empower and reward teams.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Related Comparisons

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack

AEM vs Liferay: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of Content Management Systems (CMS), Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and Liferay are two popular choices. Here, we will discuss the key differences between AEM and Liferay.

Architecture: AEM follows a Java-based architecture, while Liferay is built on Java but also supports various other programming languages like PHP and Ruby. AEM uses Apache Sling as its web application framework, while Liferay uses its own MVC framework called Liferay MVC.
Target Audience: AEM is more commonly used by enterprise-level businesses due to its robust features and scalability, whereas Liferay is often preferred by smaller businesses or organizations looking for a versatile and cost-effective CMS solution.
Customization: AEM provides extensive customization options with its flexible and modular architecture, allowing developers to create tailored solutions for specific business needs. On the other hand, Liferay offers a range of out-of-the-box features and extensions, making it easier for non-technical users to set up and manage their websites.
Licensing: AEM is a proprietary CMS developed by Adobe, which means users have to pay licensing fees to use the software. In contrast, Liferay is open-source and free to use, making it a more budget-friendly option for businesses with limited resources.
Community Support: Liferay has a strong and active community of developers who contribute to its continuous improvement, providing users with a wealth of resources, plugins, and support. Although AEM also has a community of users, it is not as extensive as Liferay's community.
Ease of Use: AEM is known for its steep learning curve and complex user interface, making it more challenging for beginners to navigate. In comparison, Liferay has a more intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easier for users of all skill levels to manage their websites efficiently.

In Summary, AEM and Liferay differ in terms of architecture, target audience, customization options, licensing, community support, and ease of use.