StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. AEM vs SiteCake

AEM vs SiteCake

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SiteCake
SiteCake
Stacks2
Followers27
Votes7
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
AEM
AEM
Stacks108
Followers134
Votes0

AEM vs SiteCake: What are the differences?

Introduction

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) and SiteCake are both content management systems used for creating and managing websites. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Scope of Use: Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a comprehensive enterprise-level content management system used by large organizations to create and manage complex websites with multiple components and integrations. On the other hand, SiteCake is a simpler, lightweight CMS designed for small to medium-sized websites with a focus on easy content editing for non-technical users.

  2. Technical Expertise: AEM requires a higher level of technical expertise to set up, customize, and maintain due to its complex architecture and feature-rich capabilities. SiteCake, on the other hand, is designed to be user-friendly and does not require coding skills, making it more accessible to non-technical users for website management.

  3. Customization and Flexibility: AEM offers extensive customization options and flexibility to create tailored solutions for specific business needs. SiteCake, while easier to use, has limited customization capabilities and is more suited for simple websites that do not require advanced features or complex integrations.

  4. Scalability: AEM is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of content and traffic, making it suitable for enterprise-level websites with high performance requirements. SiteCake, being a lightweight CMS, may face scalability limitations when it comes to handling extensive content and high traffic volumes.

  5. Integration Capabilities: AEM provides robust integration capabilities with other Adobe products and third-party systems, allowing for seamless data exchange and enhanced digital experiences. SiteCake, being a simpler CMS, may have limited integration options and may not be as well-suited for complex integrations with external systems.

  6. Cost Considerations: AEM is a premium product with licensing fees and higher implementation costs, making it more suitable for large organizations with substantial budgets. SiteCake, being a lightweight and open-source CMS, offers a cost-effective solution for small to medium-sized businesses with limited resources.

In Summary, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a comprehensive, enterprise-level CMS with advanced customization and integration capabilities, while SiteCake is a simpler, user-friendly CMS geared towards smaller websites with limited technical requirements and budget constraints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SiteCake
SiteCake
AEM
AEM

Sitecake is an easy to use CMS (Content Managament System) for small websites, with a WYSIWYG, drag&drop editor. A standard web hosting packet (a web server and PHP 5.4+) is all you need to install and use it.

It is a web-based client-server system for building, managing and deploying commercial websites and related services. It combines a number of infrastructure-level and application-level functions into a single integrated package.

Drag & drop everything;Works with plain HTML;No database needed; Opensource
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2
Stacks
108
Followers
27
Followers
134
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Great for simple static sites
  • 2
    Simple to use
  • 1
    Easy Installation
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to SiteCake, AEM?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack