StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. AIOHTTP vs ExpressJS

AIOHTTP vs ExpressJS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
Stacks35.1K
Followers24.0K
Votes1.6K
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP
Stacks125
Followers143
Votes0
GitHub Stars16.1K
Forks2.2K

AIOHTTP vs ExpressJS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

When comparing AIOHTTP and ExpressJS, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular web frameworks for building server-side applications.

  1. Language and Runtime: AIOHTTP is written in Python and is specifically designed to work with Python's asynchronous features, making it a good choice for Python developers looking to build asynchronous web applications. On the other hand, ExpressJS is based on Node.js, which is JavaScript runtime, and is known for its non-blocking I/O model, making it a great choice for building fast and scalable web applications in JavaScript.

  2. Middleware Support: AIOHTTP uses middleware functions to handle requests and responses, similar to ExpressJS. However, AIOHTTP includes built-in middleware specifically designed for handling asynchronous tasks, while ExpressJS provides a wide range of third-party middleware options through npm package management, giving developers more flexibility in customizing their application's middleware stack.

  3. Routing: ExpressJS uses a straightforward routing mechanism that allows developers to define routes using HTTP methods and URL patterns, making it easy to organize and manage the application's endpoints. In contrast, AIOHTTP utilizes a flexible routing system inspired by Python's URL dispatching, allowing developers to define routes using decorators or explicit route configuration, giving them more control over how requests are handled.

  4. Performance and Scalability: AIOHTTP leverages Python's asynchronous features to achieve high performance, particularly in handling I/O-bound operations, making it a good choice for building real-time applications that require efficient I/O handling. ExpressJS, on the other hand, is optimized for handling CPU-bound tasks efficiently, making it suitable for applications that require processing heavy computations or data manipulation.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large and active community of developers, a vast selection of npm packages, and extensive documentation, providing developers with a wealth of resources and support when building applications with ExpressJS. AIOHTTP, being a relatively newer framework compared to ExpressJS, has a smaller but growing community, fewer third-party packages, and documentation, which may require developers to rely more on core functionality or custom solutions when building applications.

  6. Flexibility and Extensibility: ExpressJS is known for its flexibility and extensibility, allowing developers to easily integrate with various databases, templating engines, and other tools through middleware and plugins. AIOHTTP, while also offering flexibility, may require more effort in integrating with external libraries or services due to the differences in language and ecosystem compared to Node.js and ExpressJS.

In Summary, it can be seen that AIOHTTP and ExpressJS differ in language/runtime, middleware support, routing mechanisms, performance/scalability, community/ecosystem, and flexibility/extensibility, catering to different use cases and preferences of developers in building server-side applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ExpressJS
ExpressJS
AIOHTTP
AIOHTTP

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

It is an Async http client/server framework. It supports both client and server Web-Sockets out-of-the-box and avoids Callback. It provides Web-server with middlewares and pluggable routing.

Robust routing;HTTP helpers (redirection, caching, etc);View system supporting 14+ template engines;Content negotiation;Focus on high performance;Executable for generating applications quickly;High test coverage
asyncio; client; server;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
35.1K
Stacks
125
Followers
24.0K
Followers
143
Votes
1.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 381
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
Cons
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to ExpressJS, AIOHTTP?

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase