Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Airflow

1.7K
2.7K
+ 1
128
Hadoop

2.5K
2.3K
+ 1
56
Add tool

Airflow vs Hadoop: What are the differences?

Introduction

Airflow and Hadoop are both popular tools used in the field of data processing and workflow management. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two. This markdown code will highlight and explain six of these key differences.

  1. Architecture: Airflow is a workflow management system that allows users to define, schedule, and monitor workflows as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs). It focuses on data pipelines and task dependencies. On the other hand, Hadoop is a distributed computing framework that provides storage and processing capabilities for big data. It is based on a cluster of commodity hardware and uses the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) for data storage.

  2. Processing Paradigm: Airflow follows a task-oriented processing paradigm, where individual tasks are executed in a sequential manner. It allows for dependency management, retries, and monitoring of task execution. In contrast, Hadoop follows a batch processing paradigm, where data is processed in bulk. It is optimized for handling large amounts of data and parallel processing on a cluster.

  3. Data Processing: Airflow focuses on orchestrating data workflows and task execution. It provides a way to schedule and monitor tasks, but the actual processing is typically done using other tools or frameworks such as Spark or SQL engines. Hadoop, on the other hand, provides a complete ecosystem for data processing. It includes tools like MapReduce, Hive, Pig, and Spark for distributed processing, querying, and analysis of data.

  4. Fault Tolerance: Airflow provides some level of fault tolerance by allowing users to define task retries and specify failure handling strategies. However, it is primarily a workflow management system and relies on the underlying infrastructure for fault tolerance. Hadoop, on the other hand, is designed to provide fault tolerance out of the box. It replicates data across multiple nodes in the cluster and can automatically recover from node failures.

  5. Scalability: Airflow can be scaled horizontally by adding more workers to handle task execution in parallel. It can also be integrated with external systems to distribute the workload. Hadoop, on the other hand, is designed to scale horizontally by adding more nodes to the cluster. It allows for distributed processing of large datasets across the cluster and can handle scalability requirements more effectively.

  6. Data Storage: Airflow does not provide its own storage system. It relies on external storage systems like databases or object storage for storing metadata and task execution state. In contrast, Hadoop provides its own distributed file system called HDFS, which allows for reliable and scalable storage of large amounts of data across the cluster.

In summary, Airflow is a workflow management system focused on task scheduling and monitoring, while Hadoop is a distributed computing framework designed for processing and analyzing big data. Airflow relies on external tools for data processing, while Hadoop provides a complete ecosystem for data processing. Airflow can be scaled horizontally, whereas Hadoop can scale both horizontally and vertically. Airflow does not provide its own storage system, while Hadoop has its own distributed file system.

Advice on Airflow and Hadoop
Needs advice
on
HadoopHadoopInfluxDBInfluxDB
and
KafkaKafka

I have a lot of data that's currently sitting in a MariaDB database, a lot of tables that weigh 200gb with indexes. Most of the large tables have a date column which is always filtered, but there are usually 4-6 additional columns that are filtered and used for statistics. I'm trying to figure out the best tool for storing and analyzing large amounts of data. Preferably self-hosted or a cheap solution. The current problem I'm running into is speed. Even with pretty good indexes, if I'm trying to load a large dataset, it's pretty slow.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
DruidDruid

Druid Could be an amazing solution for your use case, My understanding, and the assumption is you are looking to export your data from MariaDB for Analytical workload. It can be used for time series database as well as a data warehouse and can be scaled horizontally once your data increases. It's pretty easy to set up on any environment (Cloud, Kubernetes, or Self-hosted nix system). Some important features which make it a perfect solution for your use case. 1. It can do streaming ingestion (Kafka, Kinesis) as well as batch ingestion (Files from Local & Cloud Storage or Databases like MySQL, Postgres). In your case MariaDB (which has the same drivers to MySQL) 2. Columnar Database, So you can query just the fields which are required, and that runs your query faster automatically. 3. Druid intelligently partitions data based on time and time-based queries are significantly faster than traditional databases. 4. Scale up or down by just adding or removing servers, and Druid automatically rebalances. Fault-tolerant architecture routes around server failures 5. Gives ana amazing centralized UI to manage data sources, query, tasks.

See more
Needs advice
on
AirflowAirflowLuigiLuigi
and
Apache SparkApache Spark

I am so confused. I need a tool that will allow me to go to about 10 different URLs to get a list of objects. Those object lists will be hundreds or thousands in length. I then need to get detailed data lists about each object. Those detailed data lists can have hundreds of elements that could be map/reduced somehow. My batch process dies sometimes halfway through which means hours of processing gone, i.e. time wasted. I need something like a directed graph that will keep results of successful data collection and allow me either pragmatically or manually to retry the failed ones some way (0 - forever) times. I want it to then process all the ones that have succeeded or been effectively ignored and load the data store with the aggregation of some couple thousand data-points. I know hitting this many endpoints is not a good practice but I can't put collectors on all the endpoints or anything like that. It is pretty much the only way to get the data.

See more
Replies (1)
Gilroy Gordon
Solution Architect at IGonics Limited · | 2 upvotes · 286.1K views
Recommends
on
CassandraCassandra

For a non-streaming approach:

You could consider using more checkpoints throughout your spark jobs. Furthermore, you could consider separating your workload into multiple jobs with an intermittent data store (suggesting cassandra or you may choose based on your choice and availability) to store results , perform aggregations and store results of those.

Spark Job 1 - Fetch Data From 10 URLs and store data and metadata in a data store (cassandra) Spark Job 2..n - Check data store for unprocessed items and continue the aggregation

Alternatively for a streaming approach: Treating your data as stream might be useful also. Spark Streaming allows you to utilize a checkpoint interval - https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/streaming-programming-guide.html#checkpointing

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Airflow
Pros of Hadoop
  • 53
    Features
  • 14
    Task Dependency Management
  • 12
    Beautiful UI
  • 12
    Cluster of workers
  • 10
    Extensibility
  • 6
    Open source
  • 5
    Complex workflows
  • 5
    Python
  • 3
    Good api
  • 3
    Apache project
  • 3
    Custom operators
  • 2
    Dashboard
  • 39
    Great ecosystem
  • 11
    One stack to rule them all
  • 4
    Great load balancer
  • 1
    Amazon aws
  • 1
    Java syntax

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Airflow
Cons of Hadoop
  • 2
    Observability is not great when the DAGs exceed 250
  • 2
    Running it on kubernetes cluster relatively complex
  • 2
    Open source - provides minimum or no support
  • 1
    Logical separation of DAGs is not straight forward
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions