StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. CDN
  5. Akamai vs Next.js

Akamai vs Next.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Akamai
Akamai
Stacks1.9K
Followers442
Votes0
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Akamai vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will compare the key differences between Akamai and Next.js. Both Akamai and Next.js are popular technologies used for website development and optimization.

  1. Security and Content Delivery Network (CDN) Integration: Akamai is primarily a content delivery network (CDN) provider that focuses on improving website performance by caching content in its geographically distributed servers. It offers advanced security features such as DDoS protection, WAF, and bot management. On the other hand, Next.js is a framework for building server-rendered React applications. It does not provide CDN capabilities or advanced security features out of the box.

  2. Server-side Rendering (SSR) vs Client-side Rendering (CSR): Next.js supports both server-side rendering (SSR) and client-side rendering (CSR) out of the box. SSR enables faster initial page loads and improved SEO, as the HTML for each page is generated on the server and sent to the client. Akamai, being a CDN provider, focuses on caching and delivering static and dynamic content quickly, but it does not provide built-in SSR capabilities.

  3. Server Infrastructure: Akamai operates a global network of servers located in data centers worldwide. It uses this infrastructure to cache and deliver content efficiently to end-users across the globe. Next.js, being a framework, does not provide server infrastructure. Developers using Next.js need to deploy their applications on their own servers or cloud platforms like AWS, Google Cloud, or Vercel.

  4. Developers and Learning Curve: Akamai typically requires specialized knowledge and expertise to use its CDN and security services effectively. It may involve working with Akamai support and configuring complex rules and settings. Next.js, although it has a learning curve for beginners, allows developers familiar with React to quickly get started with building server-rendered applications.

  5. Flexibility and Customization: Next.js offers more flexibility and customization options compared to Akamai. As a framework, Next.js allows developers to build complex web applications using React components and various JavaScript libraries. Akamai, on the other hand, is a CDN that focuses on content delivery and optimizations, with limited customization options.

  6. Cost and Pricing Model: Akamai is a paid service, and its pricing is based on the amount of data transfer and additional services utilized. Different pricing models are available based on the specific requirements of the customer. Next.js, being an open-source framework, does not have direct costs associated with it. However, there may be expenses related to server infrastructure and hosting, depending on the deployment method chosen.

In summary, Akamai is a CDN provider focused on content delivery and security, while Next.js is a framework for building server-rendered React applications. Akamai offers advanced security and CDN integration, while Next.js provides flexibility, SSR/CSR capabilities, and customization options. The choice between the two depends on specific project requirements and the need for content delivery optimization or server-side rendering.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Akamai, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Akamai
Akamai
Next.js
Next.js

If you've ever shopped online, downloaded music, watched a web video or connected to work remotely, you've probably used Akamai's cloud platform. Akamai helps businesses connect the hyperconnected, empowering them to transform and reinvent their business online. We remove the complexities of technology, so you can focus on driving your business faster forward.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Protect your apps and APIs, stop credential abuse, and move to a Zero Trust security model with the world’s most powerful edge security platform; Focus on increasing revenue with powerful data and automation built to enhance customer experience on web and mobile applications; Deliver and monetize high-quality and secure online streaming experiences; Quickly integrate Akamai into existing developer workflows, streamlining cloud deployment and delivery
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
1.9K
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
442
Followers
5.1K
Votes
0
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Cloudinary
Cloudinary
Cloudability
Cloudability
React
React

What are some alternatives to Akamai, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase