StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. API Tools
  5. Alamofire vs Refit

Alamofire vs Refit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Alamofire
Alamofire
Stacks196
Followers94
Votes0
GitHub Stars42.2K
Forks7.6K
Refit
Refit
Stacks113
Followers30
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.3K
Forks770

Alamofire vs Refit: What are the differences?

<Alamofire and Refit are two popular libraries used for making network requests in iOS and .NET applications. Both libraries simplify the process of using network APIs, but they have key differences that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.>

  1. Implementation Language: Alamofire is written in Swift, making it suitable for iOS development, while Refit is written in C#, making it more suitable for .NET applications.

  2. Platform Compatibility: Alamofire is specifically designed for iOS development and cannot be used in .NET applications, whereas Refit is designed for .NET applications and cannot be used in iOS development.

  3. Community Support: Alamofire has a large community of iOS developers who actively contribute to its development and maintenance, while Refit has a strong community of .NET developers supporting it.

  4. Syntax and API Design: Alamofire uses a more Swift-like syntax and design patterns, which may be more familiar to iOS developers, whereas Refit uses C# syntax and design patterns that are more aligned with .NET conventions.

  5. Error Handling: Alamofire provides extensive error handling mechanisms specific to Swift, making it easier to handle errors within an iOS application, while Refit provides error handling mechanisms suitable for .NET applications.

  6. Integration with Frameworks: Alamofire integrates seamlessly with other Swift frameworks commonly used in iOS development, such as Codable for JSON parsing and Combine for reactive programming, while Refit integrates well with .NET frameworks like Entity Framework for database operations and ASP.NET Core for web applications.

In Summary, Alamofire and Refit differ in their implementation language, platform compatibility, community support, syntax, error handling, and integration with frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Alamofire
Alamofire
Refit
Refit

It is a Swift-based HTTP networking library for iOS and macOS. It provides an elegant interface on top of Apple's Foundation networking stack that simplifies a number of common networking tasks.

The automatic type-safe REST library for .NET Core, Xamarin and .NET. Heavily inspired by Square's Retrofit library, It turns your REST API into a live interface.

-
Dynamic headers; Authorization (Dynamic Headers redux)
Statistics
GitHub Stars
42.2K
GitHub Stars
9.3K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
770
Stacks
196
Stacks
113
Followers
94
Followers
30
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET
.NET

What are some alternatives to Alamofire, Refit?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Hoppscotch

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope