1. Implementation: Amazon A/B Testing allows for testing different variations of features, UI elements, and content in real-time on live traffic, while Flurry mainly focuses on analyzing user behavior and providing insights rather than conducting active tests.

2. Experimentation Scope: Amazon A/B Testing is more tailored towards optimizing user experience and conversion rates by testing specific elements, while Flurry is more focused on providing analytical tools to understand user interactions within the app.

3. Testing Environment: Amazon A/B Testing provides a controlled environment for conducting experiments with specific goals and metrics, whereas Flurry offers a more observational approach where users' behavior and patterns are analyzed without active experimentation.

4. Target Audience: Amazon A/B Testing is geared towards developers and product managers looking to improve user engagement and conversion rates by optimizing app features, while Flurry caters to marketers and analysts seeking insights into user demographics and behavior for targeted marketing strategies.

5. Metrics and Reporting: Amazon A/B Testing offers detailed metrics and reports on performance indicators such as conversion rates, engagement levels, and click-through rates, whereas Flurry provides analytics on user retention, sessions, demographics, and in-app behaviors.

6. Integration with Platforms: Amazon A/B Testing seamlessly integrates with Amazon Web Services for data collaboration and testing, while Flurry integrates with various platforms beyond just mobile apps, like wearables, connected TV devices, and more.

In Summary, Amazon A/B Testing is more focused on actively testing and optimizing app features for improved user experience and conversions, while Flurry provides analytical tools for understanding user behavior and demographics.