Home
Application and Data
Assets and Media
Content Delivery Network

Amazon CloudFront vs Bytescale

Amazon CloudFront
21.4K
10.8K
+ 1
935
Bytescale
10
19
+ 1
21
Add tool
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon CloudFront
Pros of Bytescale
  • 245
    Fast
  • 166
    Cdn
  • 157
    Compatible with other aws services
  • 125
    Simple
  • 108
    Global
  • 41
    Cheap
  • 36
    Cost-effective
  • 27
    Reliable
  • 19
    One stop solution
  • 9
    Elastic
  • 1
    Object store
  • 1
    HTTP/2 Support
  • 3
    Lightweight JS SDK
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    CDN Included
  • 2
    Cost effective
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 2
    No branding
  • 2
    Quick support
  • 1
    Transformations Included
  • 1
    Modern dashboard
  • 1
    Custom file transformations
  • 1
    Very affordable
  • 0
    Lightweight JS Widget
  • 0
    Quick support over Slack
Cons of Amazon CloudFront
Cons of Bytescale
  • 3
    UI could use some work
  • 1
    Invalidations take so long
    Be the first to leave a con
    No Stats

    What is Amazon CloudFront?

    Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

    What is Bytescale?

    Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.
    What companies use Amazon CloudFront?
    What companies use Bytescale?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More
    What tools integrate with Amazon CloudFront?
    What tools integrate with Bytescale?