StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. Amazon Cognito vs Django REST framework JWT

Amazon Cognito vs Django REST framework JWT

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Stacks616
Followers917
Votes34
Django REST framework JWT
Django REST framework JWT
Stacks59
Followers151
Votes2
GitHub Stars3.2K
Forks653

Amazon Cognito vs Django REST framework JWT: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon Cognito and Django REST Framework JWT

Amazon Cognito and Django REST Framework JWT are both popular tools used for authentication and authorization in web applications. However, there are several key differences between these two frameworks.

  1. Integration with External Identity Providers: Amazon Cognito provides built-in integration with various external identity providers, such as Google, Facebook, and Amazon. This allows users to sign in using their existing credentials from these providers. On the other hand, Django REST Framework JWT does not provide out-of-the-box integration with external identity providers. Developers would need to implement this integration themselves.

  2. Scalability and Serverless Architecture: Amazon Cognito is designed to work with serverless architectures and can scale automatically based on demand. It provides several features, such as federated sign-in, user pools, and identity pools, which allow developers to build scalable authentication systems. Django REST Framework JWT, on the other hand, is a library specifically focused on JSON Web Tokens (JWT) and does not provide the same level of scalability and serverless support as Amazon Cognito.

  3. User Management and Data Storage: Amazon Cognito offers features for user management, such as user registration, account verification, and password recovery. It also provides a user directory and allows developers to store user attributes. Django REST Framework JWT does not provide these features out of the box. Developers using Django REST Framework JWT would need to implement user management and data storage functionality themselves or use additional libraries.

  4. Authentication Workflows: Amazon Cognito supports various authentication workflows, including user authentication, social sign-in, and multi-factor authentication. It provides customizable authentication flows to fit different use cases. Django REST Framework JWT primarily focuses on JWT-based authentication and does not provide built-in support for social sign-in or multi-factor authentication. Developers using Django REST Framework JWT would need to implement these workflows themselves or rely on other libraries.

  5. Pricing Model: Amazon Cognito is a cloud service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and follows a pay-per-use pricing model. The cost is based on the number of monthly active users and the amount of data stored. Django REST Framework JWT, being an open-source library, does not have any additional costs associated with it. However, developers using Django REST Framework JWT would need to manage the infrastructure and hosting costs themselves.

  6. Platform Independence: Amazon Cognito can be used with various programming languages and platforms, including JavaScript, Android, iOS, and .NET. It provides SDKs and libraries for easy integration. Django REST Framework JWT is specifically designed for Django, a Python web framework. While it can be used with other Python frameworks, it may not provide the same level of integration and ease of use as Amazon Cognito.

In summary, Amazon Cognito provides built-in integration with external identity providers, scalability for serverless architectures, user management and data storage features, various authentication workflows, a pay-per-use pricing model, and platform independence. Django REST Framework JWT, on the other hand, requires developers to implement external identity provider integration and user management functionalities themselves, is more focused on JWT-based authentication, does not have additional costs, and is specifically designed for Django applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Cognito, Django REST framework JWT

Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Django REST framework JWT
Django REST framework JWT

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

This package provides JSON Web Token Authentication support for Django REST framework. Unlike some more typical uses of JWTs, this module only generates authentication tokens that will verify the user who is requesting one of your DRF protected API resources.

Manage Unique Identities;Work Offline;Store and Sync across Devices;Seamless Guest Access;Safeguard AWS Credentials;Control Access to AWS Resources
JSON Web Token Authentication ; Django REST framework; Generates authentication tokens
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
653
Stacks
616
Stacks
59
Followers
917
Followers
151
Votes
34
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
Cons
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
  • 1
    Docs are vast but mostly useless
Pros
  • 2
    Stateless
Integrations
No integrations available
Django REST framework
Django REST framework
Python
Python
JSON Web Token
JSON Web Token
Django
Django

What are some alternatives to Amazon Cognito, Django REST framework JWT?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Kinde

Kinde

Simple, powerful authentication that you can integrate in minutes. Free your users from passwords with secure and frictionless one click sign up and sign in. Built from the ground up using the best in class security protocols available today.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope