Amazon DynamoDB vs Sequelize

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon DynamoDB

3.7K
3.2K
+ 1
195
Sequelize

861
1.4K
+ 1
143
Add tool

Amazon DynamoDB vs Sequelize: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will provide the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize.

  1. Scalability and Cloud-based: Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), designed for high scalability and availability in the cloud. It can handle millions of requests per second and automatically scales up or down based on demand. On the other hand, Sequelize is an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that works with SQL databases. It is not inherently built for scalability and does not provide cloud-based management capabilities like DynamoDB.

  2. Data Modeling and Querying: DynamoDB is a NoSQL database, which means it does not have a fixed schema. It allows for flexible data modeling and supports key-value, document, and wide-column data models. DynamoDB uses the AWS SDK to interact with the database and has its own query language called DynamoDB Query API. Sequelize, being an ORM, works with SQL databases like MySQL, Postgres, and SQLite. It uses a fixed schema defined by database tables and supports SQL queries and transactions.

  3. Performance and Latency: DynamoDB is designed for fast, low-latency performance. It can handle high throughput and is optimized for applications with large amounts of data and high read and write loads. With DynamoDB, users can achieve single-digit millisecond latency for most operations. Sequelize, being an ORM, introduces an additional layer between the application and the database, which can add some latency compared to direct database queries. However, Sequelize offers various performance optimizations and caching mechanisms to mitigate this impact.

  4. Deployment and Management: DynamoDB is a fully managed service provided by AWS. It takes care of provisioning, capacity planning, and all backend operational tasks like backups, replication, and failover. Developers only need to define the required throughput and let AWS manage the rest. On the other hand, Sequelize requires manual setup and configuration of the database server. It needs to be deployed and managed separate from the application, either on-premises or in the cloud. Developers are responsible for configuring, maintaining, and scaling the database infrastructure.

  5. Secondary Indexes and Joins: DynamoDB provides support for Global Secondary Indexes (GSIs) and Local Secondary Indexes (LSIs), which allow for flexible querying on different attributes of the data. GSIs are eventually consistent while LSIs are strongly consistent. Sequelize, being an ORM working with relational databases, supports complex joins between tables and can perform relational operations like filtering, ordering, and aggregations using SQL queries.

  6. Pricing Model: DynamoDB pricing is based on a pay-per-use model, where users pay for the provisioned read and write capacity units, storage, and additional features like data transfer and backups. The pricing can be more suitable for scale-out applications with unpredictable workloads. Sequelize, being an ORM, does not have its own pricing model. The cost is determined by the chosen SQL database provider and the associated infrastructure costs.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize differ in their scalability and cloud-based nature, data modeling and querying capabilities, performance and latency characteristics, deployment and management responsibilities, support for secondary indexes and joins, and pricing models.

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize

We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?

See more
Replies (1)
William Frank
Data Science and Engineering at GeistM · | 2 upvotes · 107.7K views
Recommends

Hi, Akash,

I wouldn't make this decision without lots more information. Cloud Firestore has a much richer metamodel (document-oriented) than Dynamo (key-value), and Dynamo seems to be particularly restrictive. That is why it is so fast. There are many needs in most applications to get lightning access to the members of a set, one set at a time. Dynamo DB is a great choice. But, social media applications generally need to be able to make long traverses across a graph. While you can make almost any metamodel act like another one, with your own custom layers on top of it, or just by writing a lot more code, it's a long way around to do that with simple key-value sets. It's hard enough to traverse across networks of collections in a document-oriented database. So, if you are moving, I think a graph-oriented database like Amazon Neptune, or, if you might want built-in reasoning, Allegro or Ontotext, would take the least programming, which is where the most cost and bugs can be avoided. Also, managed systems are also less costly in terms of people's time and system errors. It's easier to measure the costs of managed systems, so they are often seen as more costly.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
Pros of Sequelize
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
  • 3
    No sql
  • 3
    To store data
  • 2
    Serverless
  • 2
    No Stored procedures is GOOD
  • 1
    ORM with DynamoDBMapper
  • 1
    Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode
  • 1
    Elastic Scalability using autoscaling
  • 1
    DynamoDB Stream
  • 42
    Good ORM for node.js
  • 31
    Easy setup
  • 21
    Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite
  • 14
    Open source
  • 13
    Free
  • 12
    Promise Based
  • 4
    Recommend for mongoose users
  • 3
    Typescript
  • 3
    Atrocious documentation, buggy, issues closed by bots

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
Cons of Sequelize
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
  • 30
    Docs are awful
  • 10
    Relations can be confusing

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon DynamoDB?

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is Sequelize?

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Amazon DynamoDB?
What companies use Sequelize?
See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon DynamoDB or Sequelize.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Amazon DynamoDB?
What tools integrate with Sequelize?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

GitHubPythonNode.js+47
54
72321
GitHubGitSlack+30
27
18327
GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
12
6566
GitHubPythonSlack+25
7
3155
DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
18
5970
What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize?
Google Cloud Datastore
Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.
MongoDB
MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
Amazon SimpleDB
Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.
MySQL
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
Amazon S3
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
See all alternatives