Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon DynamoDB vs Sequelize: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown document, we will provide the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize.
Scalability and Cloud-based: Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), designed for high scalability and availability in the cloud. It can handle millions of requests per second and automatically scales up or down based on demand. On the other hand, Sequelize is an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that works with SQL databases. It is not inherently built for scalability and does not provide cloud-based management capabilities like DynamoDB.
Data Modeling and Querying: DynamoDB is a NoSQL database, which means it does not have a fixed schema. It allows for flexible data modeling and supports key-value, document, and wide-column data models. DynamoDB uses the AWS SDK to interact with the database and has its own query language called DynamoDB Query API. Sequelize, being an ORM, works with SQL databases like MySQL, Postgres, and SQLite. It uses a fixed schema defined by database tables and supports SQL queries and transactions.
Performance and Latency: DynamoDB is designed for fast, low-latency performance. It can handle high throughput and is optimized for applications with large amounts of data and high read and write loads. With DynamoDB, users can achieve single-digit millisecond latency for most operations. Sequelize, being an ORM, introduces an additional layer between the application and the database, which can add some latency compared to direct database queries. However, Sequelize offers various performance optimizations and caching mechanisms to mitigate this impact.
Deployment and Management: DynamoDB is a fully managed service provided by AWS. It takes care of provisioning, capacity planning, and all backend operational tasks like backups, replication, and failover. Developers only need to define the required throughput and let AWS manage the rest. On the other hand, Sequelize requires manual setup and configuration of the database server. It needs to be deployed and managed separate from the application, either on-premises or in the cloud. Developers are responsible for configuring, maintaining, and scaling the database infrastructure.
Secondary Indexes and Joins: DynamoDB provides support for Global Secondary Indexes (GSIs) and Local Secondary Indexes (LSIs), which allow for flexible querying on different attributes of the data. GSIs are eventually consistent while LSIs are strongly consistent. Sequelize, being an ORM working with relational databases, supports complex joins between tables and can perform relational operations like filtering, ordering, and aggregations using SQL queries.
Pricing Model: DynamoDB pricing is based on a pay-per-use model, where users pay for the provisioned read and write capacity units, storage, and additional features like data transfer and backups. The pricing can be more suitable for scale-out applications with unpredictable workloads. Sequelize, being an ORM, does not have its own pricing model. The cost is determined by the chosen SQL database provider and the associated infrastructure costs.
In summary, Amazon DynamoDB and Sequelize differ in their scalability and cloud-based nature, data modeling and querying capabilities, performance and latency characteristics, deployment and management responsibilities, support for secondary indexes and joins, and pricing models.
We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?
Hi, Akash,
I wouldn't make this decision without lots more information. Cloud Firestore has a much richer metamodel (document-oriented) than Dynamo (key-value), and Dynamo seems to be particularly restrictive. That is why it is so fast. There are many needs in most applications to get lightning access to the members of a set, one set at a time. Dynamo DB is a great choice. But, social media applications generally need to be able to make long traverses across a graph. While you can make almost any metamodel act like another one, with your own custom layers on top of it, or just by writing a lot more code, it's a long way around to do that with simple key-value sets. It's hard enough to traverse across networks of collections in a document-oriented database. So, if you are moving, I think a graph-oriented database like Amazon Neptune, or, if you might want built-in reasoning, Allegro or Ontotext, would take the least programming, which is where the most cost and bugs can be avoided. Also, managed systems are also less costly in terms of people's time and system errors. It's easier to measure the costs of managed systems, so they are often seen as more costly.
Pros of Amazon DynamoDB
- Predictable performance and cost62
- Scalable56
- Native JSON Support35
- AWS Free Tier21
- Fast7
- No sql3
- To store data3
- Serverless2
- No Stored procedures is GOOD2
- ORM with DynamoDBMapper1
- Elastic Scalability using on-demand mode1
- Elastic Scalability using autoscaling1
- DynamoDB Stream1
Pros of Sequelize
- Good ORM for node.js42
- Easy setup31
- Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite21
- Open source14
- Free13
- Promise Based12
- Recommend for mongoose users4
- Typescript3
- Atrocious documentation, buggy, issues closed by bots3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon DynamoDB
- Only sequential access for paginate data4
- Scaling1
- Document Limit Size1
Cons of Sequelize
- Docs are awful30
- Relations can be confusing10