Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Mesosphere: What are the differences?
1. Scalability: Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) is highly scalable and can easily handle large workloads by automatically scaling resources up or down based on demand. Mesosphere, on the other hand, provides more flexibility in terms of scalability using its DC/OS platform, which can manage containerized workloads at a larger scale across multiple data centers.
2. Orchestration: ECS provides a simpler orchestration model for managing containers within its environment, while Mesosphere focuses on providing a multi-orchestration framework that can support various container orchestration tools such as Kubernetes, Marathon, and Docker Swarm. This gives users more options to choose the best orchestration tool that fits their specific needs.
3. Pricing: Amazon ECS is a cloud service provided by AWS with a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which can be cost-effective for smaller workloads. Mesosphere DC/OS, on the other hand, requires users to pay for a subscription based on the number of nodes managed, making it more suitable for larger and more complex containerized environments with predictable usage.
4. Integration with other AWS services: Amazon ECS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as CloudWatch, IAM, and Elastic Load Balancing, making it easier to build and manage containerized applications within the AWS ecosystem. Mesosphere also offers integration with various third-party tools and services, but may require more effort to set up and maintain these integrations compared to ECS.
5. Community support: Amazon ECS has a strong community support from AWS and a large user base, making it easier to find resources, tutorials, and solutions to common issues. Mesosphere, being an open-source platform, also has a thriving community that contributes to its development, but may not have as extensive support resources available compared to ECS.
6. Flexibility in deployment options: Amazon ECS mainly focuses on deploying containers on AWS infrastructure, limiting deployments to the AWS cloud environment. Mesosphere, with its DC/OS platform, enables users to deploy containers across various cloud providers and on-premises data centers, providing more flexibility in choosing deployment locations based on specific requirements and constraints.
In Summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Mesosphere offer unique features in terms of scalability, orchestration, pricing, integration, community support, and deployment options, catering to different needs and preferences in managing containerized workloads within different environments.
If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes. EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.
Pros of Amazon EC2 Container Service
- Backed by amazon100
- Familiar to ec272
- Cluster based53
- Simple API42
- Iam roles26
- Scheduler7
- Cluster management7
- Programmatic Control7
- Container-enabled applications4
- Socker support4
- No additional cost2
- Easy to use and cheap1
Pros of Mesosphere
- Devops6