StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Traefik

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Traefik

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Stacks14.6K
Followers10.2K
Votes325
Traefik
Traefik
Stacks965
Followers1.2K
Votes93

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Traefik: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) and Traefik. ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) for running containerized applications, while Traefik is a modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer.

  1. Scalability and Elasticity: One key difference between ECS and Traefik is their approach to scalability and elasticity. ECS offers built-in auto scaling capabilities, allowing you to easily adjust the number of container instances based on demand. On the other hand, Traefik focuses more on load balancing and routing traffic, leaving the scaling and elasticity responsibility to other components in the infrastructure.

  2. Multi-Cloud Support: Another notable difference is in terms of multi-cloud support. ECS is a cloud-native service provided by AWS and is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem. It has a limited scope when it comes to supporting multiple cloud providers. Traefik, on the other hand, is cloud-agnostic and can be deployed in various cloud environments or on-premises, making it more versatile for organizations using hybrid or multi-cloud strategies.

  3. Service Discovery and Health Checking: ECS comes with a built-in service discovery and health checking mechanism. It automatically registers containers as services and monitors their health, ensuring seamless routing of traffic to healthy containers. In contrast, Traefik relies on external service discovery solutions and health checking tools, requiring additional setup and configuration.

  4. Ease of Use and Management: ECS is a fully managed service provided by AWS, offering a high level of abstraction and ease of use. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications. Traefik, on the other hand, requires more manual configuration and management, as it is a standalone component that needs to be deployed and configured independently.

  5. Container Networking: ECS uses a managed container networking model, where containers within the same task can easily communicate with each other using Docker networking. It also integrates seamlessly with other AWS networking services like VPC and Elastic Load Balancing. Traefik, on the other hand, acts as an external load balancer and proxy, sitting in front of container instances and routing traffic based on predefined rules.

  6. Integration with Container Registries: Another difference lies in the integration with container registries. ECS integrates seamlessly with Amazon Elastic Container Registry (ECR), which is a fully-managed Docker container registry service. This allows for easy management and deployment of container images. Traefik does not have built-in integration with container registries and relies on external tools or manual processes for managing container images.

In Summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) offers built-in scalability, multi-cloud integration, and service discovery, making it an ideal choice for organizations looking for a fully managed container orchestration service within the AWS ecosystem. Traefik, on the other hand, focuses on load balancing and proxying traffic, providing flexibility and portability across different cloud environments and on-premises setups.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2 Container Service, Traefik

Andres
Andres

Lead Senior Software Engineer at InTouch Technology

Jun 3, 2020

Decided

If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes.
EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.

91.7k views91.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Traefik
Traefik

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

Docker Compatibility;Managed Clusters;Programmatic Control;Task Definitions;Scheduler;Docker Repository
Continuously updates its configuration (No restarts!); Supports multiple load balancing algorithms; Provides HTTPS to your microservices by leveraging Let's Encrypt (wildcard certificates support); Circuit breakers, retry; High Availability with cluster mode; See the magic through its clean web UI; Websocket, HTTP/2, GRPC ready; Provides metrics; Keeps access logs; Fast; Exposes a Rest API
Statistics
Stacks
14.6K
Stacks
965
Followers
10.2K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
325
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Backed by amazon
  • 72
    Familiar to ec2
  • 53
    Cluster based
  • 42
    Simple API
  • 26
    Iam roles
Pros
  • 20
    Kubernetes integration
  • 18
    Watch service discovery updates
  • 14
    Letsencrypt support
  • 13
    Swarm integration
  • 12
    Several backends
Cons
  • 7
    Not very performant (fast)
  • 7
    Complicated setup
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Marathon
Marathon
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
gRPC
gRPC
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Consul
Consul
StatsD
StatsD
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 Container Service, Traefik?

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

Fly

Fly

Deploy apps through our global load balancer with minimal shenanigans. All Fly-enabled applications get free SSL certificates, accept traffic through our global network of datacenters, and encrypt all traffic from visitors through to application servers.

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service

Azure Container Service optimizes the configuration of popular open source tools and technologies specifically for Azure. You get an open solution that offers portability for both your containers and your application configuration. You select the size, the number of hosts, and choice of orchestrator tools, and Container Service handles everything else.

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud

Docker Cloud is the best way to deploy and manage Dockerized applications. Docker Cloud makes it easy for new Docker users to manage and deploy the full spectrum of applications, from single container apps to distributed microservices stacks, to any cloud or on-premises infrastructure.

Envoy

Envoy

Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.

Hipache

Hipache

Hipache is a distributed proxy designed to route high volumes of http and websocket traffic to unusually large numbers of virtual hosts, in a highly dynamic topology where backends are added and removed several times per second. It is particularly well-suited for PaaS (platform-as-a-service) and other environments that are both business-critical and multi-tenant.

Amazon EKS

Amazon EKS

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to run Kubernetes on AWS without needing to install and operate your own Kubernetes clusters.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana