Overview

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

Stacks18

Followers51

Votes0

Mux Video

Stacks24

Followers59

Votes0

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams vs Mux Video: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare Amazon Kinesis Video Streams and Mux Video, two popular video streaming platforms, and highlight their key differences.

Scalability: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams provides virtually unlimited scalability, allowing users to ingest and process any amount of video streaming data. On the other hand, Mux Video offers scalable video infrastructure that can handle the demands of high-traffic applications but may have more limited scalability compared to Amazon Kinesis Video Streams.
Integration with AWS: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams is tightly integrated with the AWS ecosystem, making it easier to leverage other AWS services for various video processing tasks. Mux Video, however, does not have the same level of integration with AWS services, limiting the ease of integration with other AWS tools and services.
Live Streaming Support: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams supports real-time live streaming, enabling users to stream video content to a large audience in real-time. Mux Video also supports live streaming, but the extent and capabilities of its live streaming features may differ from those provided by Amazon Kinesis Video Streams.
Customization Options: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams offers a wide range of customization options, allowing users to tailor the platform to their specific needs. Mux Video also provides customization capabilities, but the extent and granularity of customization options may differ from those offered by Amazon Kinesis Video Streams.
Pricing Structure: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams has a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the duration of video ingested and processed. Mux Video, on the other hand, offers different pricing plans based on usage and features, which may have a different cost structure compared to Amazon Kinesis Video Streams.

In summary, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams provides scalable video streaming infrastructure with tight integration to the AWS ecosystem, extensive customization options, and support for real-time live streaming. Mux Video also offers scalable video infrastructure, but with potentially more limited scalability and integration options, and may have different pricing structures based on usage and features.

🔥 Trending in Video Hosting on StackShare

Skype Video Hosting

Voice calls, instant messaging, file transfer, and video conferencing

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

6

13.5k

Advice on Amazon Kinesis Video Streams, Mux Video

Kerry

Apr 23, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon S3

Docker

Wowza

We would like to connect a number of (about 25) video streams, from an Amazon S3 bucket containing video data to endpoints accessible to a Docker image, which, when run, will process the input video streams and emit some JSON statistics.

The 25 video streams should be synchronized. Could people share their experiences with a similar scenario and perhaps offer advice about which is better (Wowza, Amazon Kinesis Video Streams) for this kind of problem, or why they chose one technology over the other?

The video stream duration will be quite long (about 8 hours each x 25 camera sources). The 25 video streams will have no audio component. If you worked with a similar problem, what was your experience with scaling, latency, resource requirements, config, etc.?

88.9k views88.9k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Kinesis Video Streams	Mux Video
Amazon Kinesis Video Streams makes it easy to securely stream video from connected devices to AWS for analytics, machine learning (ML), and other processing. Kinesis Video Streams automatically provisions and elastically scales all the infrastructure needed to ingest streaming video data from millions of devices. It also durably stores, encrypts, and indexes video data in your streams, and allows you to access your data through easy-to-use APIs.	It is an API-first platform, powered by data and designed by video experts to make the beautiful video possible for every development team.
Device SDKs to securely stream data from devices; Durable storage; APIs for real-time and batch data retrieval; Video stream parser library; Video playback in the console; Build-in integration with Amazon Rekognition Video; Automatic data encryption in transit; Automatic data encryption at rest with AWS KMS; Access control with AWS IAM; Automatic indexing for search and retrieval; Fully managed; Pay per use	Instant upload;API-first; Get started in minutes, not months; Stream beautifully, everywhere
Statistics
Stacks 18	Stacks 24
Followers 51	Followers 59
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Amazon EC2 Container Service Amazon Rekognition Video AWS IAM AWS Key Management Service TensorFlow OpenCV Amazon Kinesis	Golang Node.js Elixir Python PHP Ruby

What are some alternatives to Amazon Kinesis Video Streams, Mux Video?

OBS Studio

It is a free and open source software for video recording and live streaming. It is equipped with a powerful API, enabling plugins and scripts to provide further customization and functionality specific to your needs. It supports all your favorite streaming platforms and more.

Wowza

It offers a customizable live streaming platform to build, deploy and manage high-quality video, live and on-demand. It powers professional-grade streaming for any use case and any device.

api.video

api.video is an API-first platform which enables developers to build, scale and operate on-demand and live video streaming in their own apps and platforms in minutes, with just a few lines of code.

Bitmovin

It provides adaptive streaming infrastructure for video publishers and integrators. Fastest cloud encoding and HTML5 Player, play Video Anywhere.

Lightspeed

It is a self contained OBS -> FTL -> WebRTC live streaming server. It is comprised of 3 parts once configured anyone can achieve sub-second OBS to the browser livestreaming.

Ant Media Server

It is streaming engine software that provides adaptive, ultra low latency streaming by using WebRTC technology with ~0.5 seconds latency. It is both horizontally and vertically scalable. It can run on-premise or on-cloud.

OneStream Live

Schedule & Live Stream Recorded Videos to 40+ Social Media Platforms Simultaneously. Multicast to 40+ streaming networks including Facebook Live, YouTube, Twitter's Periscope, Twitch, Mixer, Smashcast & many more.

muse.ai

Cheapest way to host and share your video without adverts. Includes the most advanced AI powered in-video search.

Owncast

It is a self-hosted live video and web chat server for use with existing popular broadcasting software. Point your live stream at a server you personally control and regain ownership over your content.

Ziggeo

It is a cloud-based video technology SaaS (Software as a Service) company that provides asynchronous video APIs, mobile SDKs and tools to deliver enterprise-grade WebRTC capabilities.