Amazon SQS vs RSMQ vs simplehttp

Amazon SQS
Amazon SQS

903
254
125
RSMQ
RSMQ

2
0
3
simplehttp
simplehttp

0
0
0
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is RSMQ?

tl;dr: If you run a Redis server and currently use Amazon SQS or a similar message queue you might as well use this fast little replacement. Using a shared Redis server multiple Node.js processes can send / receive messages.

What is simplehttp?

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Amazon SQS?
Why do developers choose RSMQ?
Why do developers choose simplehttp?
    Be the first to leave a pro
    What are the cons of using Amazon SQS?
    What are the cons of using RSMQ?
    What are the cons of using simplehttp?
      Be the first to leave a con
        Be the first to leave a con
        What companies use Amazon SQS?
        What companies use RSMQ?
        What companies use simplehttp?
          No companies found
          What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS, RSMQ, and simplehttp?
          Amazon MQ
          Amazon MQ is a managed message broker service for Apache ActiveMQ that makes it easy to set up and operate message brokers in the cloud.
          Kafka
          Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
          Redis
          Redis is an open source, BSD licensed, advanced key-value store. It is often referred to as a data structure server since keys can contain strings, hashes, lists, sets and sorted sets.
          ActiveMQ
          Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
          Amazon SNS
          Amazon Simple Notification Service makes it simple and cost-effective to push to mobile devices such as iPhone, iPad, Android, Kindle Fire, and internet connected smart devices, as well as pushing to other distributed services. Besides pushing cloud notifications directly to mobile devices, SNS can also deliver notifications by SMS text message or email, to Simple Queue Service (SQS) queues, or to any HTTP endpoint.
          See all alternatives
          What tools integrate with Amazon SQS?
          What tools integrate with RSMQ?
          What tools integrate with simplehttp?
            No integrations found
              No integrations found
              Decisions about Amazon SQS, RSMQ, and simplehttp
              No stack decisions found
              Interest over time
              Reviews of Amazon SQS, RSMQ, and simplehttp
              No reviews found
              How developers use Amazon SQS, RSMQ, and simplehttp
              Avatar of Karma
              Karma uses Amazon SQSAmazon SQS

              In the beginning we thought we wanted to start using something like RabbitMQ or maybe Kafka or maybe ActiveMQ. Back then we only had a few developers and no ops people. That has changed now, but we didn't really look forward to setting up a queuing cluster and making sure that all works.

              What we did instead was we looked at what services Amazon offers to see if we can use those to build our own messaging system within those services. That's basically what we did. We wrote some clients in Ruby that can basically do the entire orchestration for us, and we run all our messaging on both SNS and SQS. Basically what you can do in Amazon services is you can use Amazon Simple Notification Service, so SNS, for creating topics and you can use queues to subscribe to these topics. That's basically all you need for a messaging system. You don't have to worry about scalability at all. That's what really appealed to us.

              Avatar of Brandon Adams
              Brandon Adams uses Amazon SQSAmazon SQS

              This isn't exactly low-latency (10s to 100s of milliseconds), but it has good throughput and a simple API. There is good reliability, and there is no configuration necessary to get up and running. A hosted queue is important when trying to move fast.

              Avatar of Simple Merchant
              Simple Merchant uses Amazon SQSAmazon SQS

              SQS is the bridge between our new Lambda services and our incumbent Rails applications. Extremely easy to use when you're already using other AWS infrastructure.

              Avatar of Olo
              Olo uses Amazon SQSAmazon SQS

              Primary message queue. Enqueueing operations revert to a local file-system-based queue when SQS is unavailable.

              Avatar of IndiTip
              IndiTip uses Amazon SQSAmazon SQS

              I can't afford to lose data if Dynamo throttles my writes, so everything goes into a message queue first.

              How much does Amazon SQS cost?
              How much does RSMQ cost?
              How much does simplehttp cost?
              Pricing unavailable
              Pricing unavailable
              News about RSMQ
              More news
              News about simplehttp
              More news