Amazon SQS vs. Sparrow

Get help choosing one of these



Hacker News, Reddit, Stack Overflow Stats

  • -
  • 6
  • 1.7K
  • 81
  • 9.86K
  • 0

Description

What is Amazon SQS?

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

What is Sparrow?

Sparrow keeps messages in memory, but persists them to disk, using Sqlite, when the queue is shutdown.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Ask a Question

Pros

Why do developers choose Amazon SQS?
Why do you like Amazon SQS?

Why do developers choose Sparrow?
Why do you like Sparrow?

Cons

What are the cons of using Amazon SQS?
No Cons submitted yet for Amazon SQS
Downsides of Amazon SQS?

What are the cons of using Sparrow?
No Cons submitted yet for Sparrow
Downsides of Sparrow?

Pricing

How much does Amazon SQS cost?
Amazon SQS Pricing
How much does Sparrow cost?

Companies

What companies use Amazon SQS?
342 companies on StackShare use Amazon SQS
What companies use Sparrow?
0 companies on StackShare use Sparrow

Integrations

What tools integrate with Amazon SQS?
5 tools on StackShare integrate with Amazon SQS
No integrations listed yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon SQS and Sparrow?

  • RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is a messaging broker - an intermediary for messaging
  • Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system
  • Celery - Distributed task queue
  • ActiveMQ - A message broker written in Java together with a full JMS client

See all alternatives to Amazon SQS



Interest Over Time


Get help choosing one of these