Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Angular Material vs DevExtreme: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Angular Material and DevExtreme
Angular Material and DevExtreme are two popular frameworks for building web applications with modern and responsive user interfaces. While they both offer a range of UI components and tools, there are several key differences that set them apart.
Component Design and Customization: Angular Material follows Google's Material Design guidelines and provides a set of pre-designed, visually consistent components. These components have limited customization options, which ensures a consistent look and feel across applications. On the other hand, DevExtreme offers highly customizable and extensible components, allowing developers to tailor the UI to their specific needs and branding requirements.
Integration with Angular: Angular Material is built specifically for Angular applications and provides seamless integration with the Angular framework. It follows Angular's component-based architecture and leverages Angular's features, such as dependency injection and reactive forms. DevExtreme, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with various frontend frameworks, including Angular. It provides its own set of features and utilities, independent of the underlying framework.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Angular Material benefits from the large and active Angular community. It has extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support, making it easier for developers to find solutions and resources. DevExtreme also has a considerable community, but it may not be as vast as the Angular community due to its framework-agnostic nature. However, DevExtreme offers additional features like data visualization and integration with other third-party libraries, expanding its ecosystem beyond UI components.
Performance and Bundle Size: Angular Material aims to provide a lightweight and optimized set of components, ensuring good performance and minimal bundle size. With a focus on code efficiency, it minimizes the impact on application performance. DevExtreme, on the other hand, offers a rich set of features and utilities, which may result in a larger bundle size. However, DevExtreme provides advanced performance optimization techniques like virtual scrolling and data caching to ensure smooth performance even with large datasets.
Pricing and Licensing: Angular Material is an open-source project, licensed under the MIT license, which allows free usage and modification. It is a part of the broader Angular ecosystem and does not require any additional licensing fees. DevExtreme, on the other hand, is a commercial product offered by DevExpress. It requires purchasing a license for commercial usage and provides additional support and enterprise-grade features.
Platform Support: Angular Material aims to provide a consistent UI experience across different platforms, including web, mobile, and desktop. It supports responsive design and adapts to different screen sizes and orientations. DevExtreme also offers multi-platform support with its responsive design, but it primarily focuses on web application development and may not provide as extensive support for mobile and desktop platforms.
In summary, Angular Material and DevExtreme differ in their component design and customization options, integration with Angular, community support and ecosystem, performance and bundle size, pricing and licensing, and platform support. These differences allow developers to choose the framework that best aligns with their design requirements, development approach, and the target platform.
Pros of Angular Material
- Components12
- Backed by a well known company8
- Simple4
- Easy3
- Very good documentation2
- Rte2
- Implements well known material design1
Pros of DevExtreme
- Components1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Angular Material
- Fairly large4
- Look like 90s stuffs2
- Suck2
- Shit2
Cons of DevExtreme
- Large transfer size4
- Customisation1