StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Animate.css vs Quasar Framework

Animate.css vs Quasar Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Animate.css
Animate.css
Stacks11.4K
Followers3.1K
Votes0
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework
Stacks451
Followers771
Votes404
GitHub Stars26.9K
Forks3.7K

Animate.css vs Quasar Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Animate.css and Quasar Framework are two popular tools used in web development. While Animate.css is a CSS animation library, Quasar Framework is a comprehensive framework for building responsive websites and applications. Here are the key differences between the two:

  1. Animation vs Framework: The fundamental difference between Animate.css and Quasar Framework lies in their purpose and functionality. Animate.css is primarily used for adding pre-defined animations to HTML elements, allowing developers to easily apply visual effects without much coding. On the other hand, Quasar Framework is a complete framework that offers a wide range of components, plugins, and tools for building fully functional and interactive websites or applications.

  2. Ease of Use: Animate.css is highly beginner-friendly and can be easily implemented with minimal effort. It provides a collection of CSS classes that can be directly added to HTML elements to trigger various animations. In contrast, Quasar Framework requires more learning and familiarity with JavaScript and Vue.js, as it involves building components, writing logic, and implementing complex functionalities.

  3. Customizability: Animate.css provides a set of pre-defined animations, and while it offers some customization options like duration and delay, it is limited in terms of modifying the animations themselves. Quasar Framework, on the other hand, allows developers to fully customize the appearance and behavior of components, giving them more control and flexibility over the look and functionality of their projects.

  4. Component Ecosystem: Quasar Framework provides a rich component ecosystem, offering a wide range of ready-to-use UI components that are fully compatible and integrated with each other. This makes it easier and more efficient to build consistent and professional-looking websites or applications. In contrast, Animate.css is more focused on animations and does not provide any ready-to-use components, making it suitable for adding animations to existing projects rather than building complete ones.

  5. Scalability: Quasar Framework is designed for building scalable and large-scale projects, allowing developers to easily manage and maintain complex codebases. It provides features and tools like code splitting, lazy loading, and internationalization, which are essential for handling large projects. Animate.css, being a lightweight animation library, is not specifically designed for scalability and may not provide the same level of performance optimization and project management capabilities as Quasar Framework.

  6. Community and Support: Quasar Framework has a larger and more active community of developers, providing extensive documentation, forums, and resources for support. It is constantly evolving and regularly updated with new features and improvements. Animate.css, although widely used, has a smaller community and may have limited resources and support available.

In summary, Animate.css is a lightweight CSS animation library primarily used for adding pre-defined animations to HTML elements, while Quasar Framework is a comprehensive framework for building responsive websites and applications, offering a wide range of components, customization options, scalability, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Animate.css
Animate.css
Quasar Framework
Quasar Framework

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Cross-browser animations; Usage with Javascript; Setting Delay and Speed
SPAs (Single Page App); SSR (Server-side Rendered App); PWAs (Progressive Web App); Mobile apps (Android, iOS, …); Electron; Vue.js; Full RTL support; Persian calendar; Material design 2; Complete documentation; Unit test ready
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
26.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
Stacks
11.4K
Stacks
451
Followers
3.1K
Followers
771
Votes
0
Votes
404
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 59
    Excellent documentation
  • 44
    Deploy one codebase to web, desktop, mobile, and more
  • 40
    Lots of UI components
  • 39
    Extensive collection of components
  • 33
    Being able to bundle for almost all platform is awesome
Cons
  • 4
    Stackoverflow 1.5k Questions
Integrations
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5
Linux
Linux
Electron
Electron
macOS
macOS
Windows
Windows
Vue.js
Vue.js
Material Design
Material Design

What are some alternatives to Animate.css , Quasar Framework?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Less

Less

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase