Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Xen Orchestra vs Ant Design: What are the differences?
Developers describe Xen Orchestra as "The Web Interface for XenServer". It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs. On the other hand, Ant Design is detailed as "A set of high-quality React components". An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.
Xen Orchestra belongs to "Virtual Machine Management" category of the tech stack, while Ant Design can be primarily classified under "UI Components".
Some of the features offered by Xen Orchestra are:
- Xen management
- Easy-to-use
- Fast
On the other hand, Ant Design provides the following key features:
- Cases
- Principles
- Proximity
Xen Orchestra and Ant Design are both open source tools. It seems that Ant Design with 51.9K GitHub stars and 18.5K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Xen Orchestra with 236 GitHub stars and 89 GitHub forks.
Pros of Ant Design
- Lots of components48
- Polished and enterprisey look and feel33
- TypeScript21
- Easy to integrate21
- Es6 support18
- Typescript support17
- Beautiful and solid17
- Beautifully Animated Components16
- Quick Release rhythm15
- Great documentation14
- Easy to customize Forms2
- Opensource and free of cost2
Pros of Xen Orchestra
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ant Design
- Less24
- Large File Size10
- Poor accessibility support4
- Dangerous to use as a base in component libraries3
