Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Ant vs Visual Studio Code: What are the differences?
Comparison between Apache Ant and Visual Studio Code
Apache Ant and Visual Studio Code are two popular development tools used by programmers. While both serve the purpose of helping in software development, they have several key differences.
1. Language compatibility: Apache Ant is primarily used for Java projects and is built on top of the Java platform. On the other hand, Visual Studio Code supports a wide range of programming languages including but not limited to Java, C++, Python, and JavaScript.
2. Build automation vs. Code editor: Apache Ant is mainly a build automation tool that helps in compiling, testing, and packaging software. It provides extensive support for managing the build process. In contrast, Visual Studio Code is primarily a lightweight code editor with powerful features like IntelliSense, debugging, and version control integration.
3. Extensibility: Visual Studio Code has a rich ecosystem of extensions that allow developers to customize and enhance their coding experience. These extensions provide additional functionality, such as language support, code snippets, and productivity tools. Apache Ant, on the other hand, does not have a similar extension ecosystem.
4. Integrated Development Environment (IDE) features: Visual Studio Code provides a set of powerful IDE-like features, including integrated terminals, source control integration, and a built-in debugger. These features make it easier for developers to work on complex projects. In contrast, Apache Ant does not offer these IDE-like features.
5. Learning curve: Visual Studio Code has a relatively low learning curve and is user-friendly, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced developers. Apache Ant, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires familiarity with XML and the Ant build file structure.
6. Project complexity: Apache Ant is well-suited for large-scale projects with complex build requirements. It provides advanced build capabilities and can handle complex dependencies. Visual Studio Code, on the other hand, is better suited for smaller projects or individual code files.
In summary, Apache Ant is a powerful build automation tool primarily used for Java projects, while Visual Studio Code is a versatile code editor with support for multiple programming languages and a rich ecosystem of extensions.
Lightweight and versatile. Huge library of extensions that enable you to integrate a host of services to your development environment. VS Code's biggest strength is its library of extensions which enables it to directly compete with every single major IDE for almost all major programming languages.
Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.
Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.
I decided to choose VSCode over Sublime text for my Systems Programming class in C. What I love about VSCode is its awesome ability to add extensions. Intellisense is a beautiful debugger, and Remote SSH allows me to login and make real-time changes in VSCode to files on my university server. This is an awesome alternative to going back and forth on pushing/pulling code and logging into servers in the terminal. Great choice for anyone interested in C programming!
Pros of Apache Ant
- Flexible4
- Simple1
- Easy to learn1
- Easy to write own java-build-hooks1
Pros of Visual Studio Code
- Powerful multilanguage IDE340
- Fast308
- Front-end develop out of the box193
- Support TypeScript IntelliSense158
- Very basic but free142
- Git integration126
- Intellisense106
- Faster than Atom78
- Better ui, easy plugins, and nice git integration53
- Great Refactoring Tools45
- Good Plugins44
- Terminal42
- Superb markdown support38
- Open Source36
- Extensions35
- Awesome UI26
- Large & up-to-date extension community26
- Powerful and fast24
- Portable22
- Best code editor18
- Best editor18
- Easy to get started with17
- Lots of extensions15
- Good for begginers15
- Crossplatform15
- Built on Electron15
- Extensions for everything14
- Open, cross-platform, fast, monthly updates14
- All Languages Support14
- Easy to use and learn13
- "fast, stable & easy to use"12
- Extensible12
- Ui design is great11
- Totally customizable11
- Git out of the box11
- Useful for begginer11
- Faster edit for slow computer11
- SSH support10
- Great community10
- Fast Startup10
- Works With Almost EveryThing You Need9
- Great language support9
- Powerful Debugger9
- It has terminal and there are lots of shortcuts in it9
- Can compile and run .py files8
- Python extension is fast8
- Features rich7
- Great document formater7
- He is not Michael6
- Extension Echosystem6
- She is not Rachel6
- Awesome multi cursor support6
- VSCode.pro Course makes it easy to learn5
- Language server client5
- SFTP Workspace5
- Very proffesional5
- Easy azure5
- Has better support and more extentions for debugging4
- Supports lots of operating systems4
- Excellent as git difftool and mergetool4
- Virtualenv integration4
- Better autocompletes than Atom3
- Has more than enough languages for any developer3
- 'batteries included'3
- More tools to integrate with vs3
- Emmet preinstalled3
- VS Code Server: Browser version of VS Code2
- CMake support with autocomplete2
- Microsoft2
- Customizable2
- Light2
- Big extension marketplace2
- Fast and ruby is built right in2
- File:///C:/Users/ydemi/Downloads/yuksel_demirkaya_webpa1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Ant
- Slow1
- Old and not widely used anymore1
Cons of Visual Studio Code
- Slow startup46
- Resource hog at times29
- Poor refactoring20
- Poor UI Designer13
- Weak Ui design tools11
- Poor autocomplete10
- Super Slow8
- Huge cpu usage with few installed extension8
- Microsoft sends telemetry data8
- Poor in PHP7
- It's MicroSoft6
- Poor in Python3
- No Built in Browser Preview3
- No color Intergrator3
- Very basic for java development and buggy at times3
- No built in live Preview3
- Electron3
- Bad Plugin Architecture2
- Powered by Electron2
- Terminal does not identify path vars sometimes1
- Slow C++ Language Server1