Anvil vs Azure Websites

Overview

Azure Websites

Stacks404

Followers404

Votes23

Anvil

Stacks51

Followers219

Votes23

Anvil vs Azure Websites: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Anvil and Azure Websites

Pricing Structure: Anvil offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on usage, while Azure Websites follows a more dynamic pricing structure that can include discounts for long-term commitments.
Platform Compatibility: Anvil primarily targets Python developers and provides a platform where code can be written and deployed directly within the browser, whereas Azure Websites supports a wider range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a more versatile option for developers.
Scalability Options: In terms of scalability, Anvil offers automatic scaling based on demand, while Azure Websites gives users more control over scaling options, allowing for manual adjustments based on specific requirements.
Integration with Other Azure Services: Azure Websites seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as databases, storage, and analytics, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for building and managing web applications, whereas Anvil may have limitations in terms of integration with third-party services outside of its platform.
Deployment Process: Anvil simplifies the deployment process by allowing users to publish applications with a single click, while Azure Websites offers more advanced deployment options, including support for continuous integration and delivery pipelines.
Support and Community Resources: Azure Websites benefits from Microsoft's extensive support network and community resources, offering users access to documentation, tutorials, and forums, whereas Anvil has a smaller user base and may have limited support options.

In Summary, Anvil and Azure Websites differ in pricing structure, platform compatibility, scalability options, integration with other services, deployment process, and support resources.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Websites	Anvil
Azure Websites is a fully managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that enables you to build, deploy and scale enterprise-grade web Apps in seconds. Focus on your application code, and let Azure take care of the infrastructure to scale and securely run it for you.	Anvil is a platform for building and hosting full-stack web apps written entirely in Python. Drag & drop your UI, then write Python on the front-end and back-end to make it all work. Web development has never been this easy (or fast)!
.NET, Java, PHP, Node.js, Python;Built-in AutoScale and Load Balancing;High Availability with Auto-Patching;Continuous Deployment with Git, TFS, GitHub;SQL Databases, MySQL, DocumentDB, Search, MongoDB;WordPress, Umbraco, Joomla, Drupal	Drag and drop UI builder; Full-stack Python; Client-side Python; Built-in database; Built-in user authentication; Simple integration with existing services and code; On-site installation supported; Expose REST APIs with one line of code; Rich set of UI components: Forms, plotting, maps, and more; Built-in support for all your favourite Python packages; Simple but powerful version control; Team collaboration; Active Directory integration
Statistics
Stacks 404	Stacks 51
Followers 404	Followers 219
Votes 23	Votes 23
Pros & Cons
Pros 17 Ease of deployment 6 Free plans for students	Pros 6 Fast dashboards deployment 4 Open source 4 Python everywhere 3 Drag-and-drop UI builder 3 Easy to deploy
Integrations
No integrations available	Google Drive Stripe Python Plotly.js Google Maps

What are some alternatives to Azure Websites, Anvil?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

Related Comparisons

Anvil vs Azure Websites: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Anvil and Azure Websites

Pricing Structure: Anvil offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on usage, while Azure Websites follows a more dynamic pricing structure that can include discounts for long-term commitments.
Platform Compatibility: Anvil primarily targets Python developers and provides a platform where code can be written and deployed directly within the browser, whereas Azure Websites supports a wider range of programming languages and frameworks, making it a more versatile option for developers.
Scalability Options: In terms of scalability, Anvil offers automatic scaling based on demand, while Azure Websites gives users more control over scaling options, allowing for manual adjustments based on specific requirements.
Integration with Other Azure Services: Azure Websites seamlessly integrates with other Azure services such as databases, storage, and analytics, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for building and managing web applications, whereas Anvil may have limitations in terms of integration with third-party services outside of its platform.
Deployment Process: Anvil simplifies the deployment process by allowing users to publish applications with a single click, while Azure Websites offers more advanced deployment options, including support for continuous integration and delivery pipelines.
Support and Community Resources: Azure Websites benefits from Microsoft's extensive support network and community resources, offering users access to documentation, tutorials, and forums, whereas Anvil has a smaller user base and may have limited support options.

In Summary, Anvil and Azure Websites differ in pricing structure, platform compatibility, scalability options, integration with other services, deployment process, and support resources.

Anvil vs Azure Websites

Overview