StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Cloud Hosting
  5. Apache Camel vs WSO2 Integration Cloud

Apache Camel vs WSO2 Integration Cloud

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WSO2 Integration Cloud
WSO2 Integration Cloud
Stacks6
Followers13
Votes0
Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Stacks8.2K
Followers323
Votes22
GitHub Stars6.0K
Forks5.1K

Apache Camel vs WSO2 Integration Cloud: What are the differences?

Introduction

Below are the key differences between Apache Camel and WSO2 Integration Cloud.

  1. Deployment Model: Apache Camel is an open-source framework for integration which can be deployed on-premises or in any cloud environment. On the other hand, WSO2 Integration Cloud is a fully-managed cloud-based integration platform that allows users to develop, deploy, and manage integration flows without the need for infrastructure setup and maintenance.

  2. Technology Stack: Apache Camel is built on top of a Java-based integration framework and supports various messaging patterns and transport protocols. WSO2 Integration Cloud, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive integration platform that leverages WSO2's middleware technologies such as WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, WSO2 Message Broker, and WSO2 API Manager.

  3. Enterprise-Grade Features: WSO2 Integration Cloud offers out-of-the-box enterprise-grade features such as security, scalability, high availability, and multi-tenancy. These features are built-in and managed by WSO2, allowing users to focus on developing integration logic rather than managing infrastructure and security.

  4. Connectivity Options: Apache Camel supports a wide range of connectors and components that enable integration with various systems and technologies. WSO2 Integration Cloud also provides connectors and adapters for integrating with popular systems, databases, and protocols. Additionally, it offers built-in connectors to WSO2's middleware products, making it easy to connect and integrate with other WSO2 components.

  5. Development Environment: Apache Camel provides a flexible development environment where developers can write integration logic using Java, XML, or a Domain Specific Language (DSL) called Apache Camel DSL. WSO2 Integration Cloud offers a web-based graphical tool called the Integration Studio, which allows developers to visually design and develop integration flows without writing code.

  6. Scalability and Performance: WSO2 Integration Cloud provides built-in scalability and performance features such as load balancing, clustering, and caching. These features ensure that integration flows can handle high volumes of data and maintain consistent performance even under heavy loads. Apache Camel, being a framework, can also be scaled and optimized for performance, but it requires manual configuration and setup.

In summary, Apache Camel and WSO2 Integration Cloud differ in terms of deployment model, technology stack, enterprise-grade features, connectivity options, development environment, and scalability/performance. WSO2 Integration Cloud offers a fully-managed cloud-based platform with integrated enterprise-grade features, whereas Apache Camel is a versatile open-source integration framework that can be deployed in various environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

WSO2 Integration Cloud
WSO2 Integration Cloud
Apache Camel
Apache Camel

It allows you to host your cloud-to-cloud, cloud-to-on-premises integrations and API backends on a scalable cloud platform.

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

Robust cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-enterprise integration; Manage, monitor and analyze; Expose integrations in api cloud; Complete container-based application hosting platform
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.1K
Stacks
6
Stacks
8.2K
Followers
13
Followers
323
Votes
0
Votes
22
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 5
    Based on Enterprise Integration Patterns
  • 4
    Highly configurable
  • 4
    Has over 250 components
  • 4
    Free (open source)
  • 3
    Open Source
Integrations
Gmail
Gmail
WSO2 API Cloud
WSO2 API Cloud
Spring Boot
Spring Boot

What are some alternatives to WSO2 Integration Cloud, Apache Camel?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

DigitalOcean

DigitalOcean

We take the complexities out of cloud hosting by offering blazing fast, on-demand SSD cloud servers, straightforward pricing, a simple API, and an easy-to-use control panel.

Amazon EC2

Amazon EC2

It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Microsoft Azure

Microsoft Azure

Azure is an open and flexible cloud platform that enables you to quickly build, deploy and manage applications across a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters. You can build applications using any language, tool or framework. And you can integrate your public cloud applications with your existing IT environment.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine

Google Compute Engine is a service that provides virtual machines that run on Google infrastructure. Google Compute Engine offers scale, performance, and value that allows you to easily launch large compute clusters on Google's infrastructure. There are no upfront investments and you can run up to thousands of virtual CPUs on a system that has been designed from the ground up to be fast, and to offer strong consistency of performance.

Linode

Linode

Get a server running in minutes with your choice of Linux distro, resources, and node location.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase