StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data As A Service
  5. Apache Kudu vs Google BigQuery

Apache Kudu vs Google BigQuery

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.5K
Votes152
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu
Stacks71
Followers259
Votes10
GitHub Stars828
Forks282

Apache Kudu vs Google BigQuery: What are the differences?

# Apache Kudu vs Google BigQuery

Apache Kudu and Google BigQuery are two popular tools used for data processing and analysis. While they both have strengths in their own right, there are key differences that set them apart.

1. **Storage Architecture**: Apache Kudu uses a columnar storage engine that is optimized for analytical workloads, allowing for efficient real-time analytics on rapidly changing data. In contrast, Google BigQuery uses a proprietary storage system that is highly scalable and designed to handle large datasets for querying and analysis.

2. **Query Processing**: Apache Kudu supports SQL queries natively, making it easy for users to interact with the data using familiar syntax. On the other hand, Google BigQuery uses a serverless, fully managed architecture that automatically scales to handle ad-hoc queries and large datasets without the need for manual intervention.

3. **Data Partitioning**: Apache Kudu allows for granular control over data placement and distribution through partitioning and sharding, enabling users to optimize performance based on their specific requirements. Google BigQuery automatically partitions data behind the scenes, simplifying the process for users but potentially limiting customization options.

4. **Cost Structure**: Apache Kudu is an open-source project that can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, offering greater flexibility and control over costs. In contrast, Google BigQuery operates on a pay-per-query pricing model, where users are billed based on the amount of data processed, making it more suitable for organizations with variable workloads.

5. **Real-time Analytics**: Apache Kudu excels in supporting real-time analytics use cases, thanks to its in-memory processing capabilities and low latency data access. Google BigQuery, while powerful for batch processing and ad-hoc queries, may not be as well-suited for real-time analytics scenarios.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: Apache Kudu integrates seamlessly with popular big data tools such as Apache Spark and Apache Impala, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for data processing and analysis. Google BigQuery, being a Google Cloud service, offers tight integration with other GCP services and tools, simplifying workflow management for users in the Google ecosystem.

In Summary, Apache Kudu and Google BigQuery offer distinct advantages in terms of storage architecture, query processing, data partitioning, cost structure, real-time analytics capabilities, and ecosystem integration, catering to different needs and preferences in the realm of data analytics and processing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Apache Kudu
Apache Kudu

Run super-fast, SQL-like queries against terabytes of data in seconds, using the processing power of Google's infrastructure. Load data with ease. Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in. Easy access. Access BigQuery by using a browser tool, a command-line tool, or by making calls to the BigQuery REST API with client libraries such as Java, PHP or Python.

A new addition to the open source Apache Hadoop ecosystem, Kudu completes Hadoop's storage layer to enable fast analytics on fast data.

All behind the scenes- Your queries can execute asynchronously in the background, and can be polled for status.;Import data with ease- Bulk load your data using Google Cloud Storage or stream it in bursts of up to 1,000 rows per second.;Affordable big data- The first Terabyte of data processed each month is free.;The right interface- Separate interfaces for administration and developers will make sure that you have access to the tools you need.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
828
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
282
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
71
Followers
1.5K
Followers
259
Votes
152
Votes
10
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    High Performance
  • 25
    Easy to use
  • 22
    Fully managed service
  • 19
    Cheap Pricing
  • 16
    Process hundreds of GB in seconds
Cons
  • 1
    You can't unit test changes in BQ data
  • 0
    Sdas
Pros
  • 10
    Realtime Analytics
Cons
  • 1
    Restart time
Integrations
Xplenty
Xplenty
Fluentd
Fluentd
Looker
Looker
Chartio
Chartio
Treasure Data
Treasure Data
Hadoop
Hadoop

What are some alternatives to Google BigQuery, Apache Kudu?

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Amazon Redshift

Amazon Redshift

It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.

Qubole

Qubole

Qubole is a cloud based service that makes big data easy for analysts and data engineers.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon EMR

Amazon EMR

It is used in a variety of applications, including log analysis, data warehousing, machine learning, financial analysis, scientific simulation, and bioinformatics.

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

lakeFS

lakeFS

It is an open-source data version control system for data lakes. It provides a “Git for data” platform enabling you to implement best practices from software engineering on your data lake, including branching and merging, CI/CD, and production-like dev/test environments.

Druid

Druid

Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.

Altiscale

Altiscale

we run Apache Hadoop for you. We not only deploy Hadoop, we monitor, manage, fix, and update it for you. Then we take it a step further: We monitor your jobs, notify you when something’s wrong with them, and can help with tuning.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase