StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Workflow Manager
  5. Apache Oozie vs Yarn

Apache Oozie vs Yarn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Oozie
Apache Oozie
Stacks40
Followers76
Votes0
Yarn
Yarn
Stacks28.2K
Followers13.5K
Votes151
GitHub Stars41.5K
Forks2.7K

Apache Oozie vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Oozie and Apache Yarn are two popular technologies used in the Apache Hadoop ecosystem. While Apache Oozie is a workflow scheduling system for managing Apache Hadoop jobs, Apache Yarn is a resource management framework that allows multiple data processing engines to run on Hadoop clusters. Understanding the key differences between these two technologies is crucial for making informed decisions when working with big data processing.

  1. Integration with Hadoop Components: One of the key differences between Apache Oozie and Yarn is their integration with other components in the Hadoop ecosystem. Oozie acts as a workflow scheduler for managing jobs in Hadoop, while Yarn provides a resource management framework that allows multiple data processing engines such as MapReduce, Spark, and Tez to run on Hadoop clusters.

  2. Functionality: Another major difference lies in their functionality. Oozie primarily focuses on coordinating and scheduling workflows, providing advanced scheduling capabilities and supporting complex job dependencies. On the other hand, Yarn focuses on the resource management aspects of a Hadoop cluster, providing a fine-grained control of resources and facilitating efficient utilization of cluster resources among different data processing frameworks.

  3. High-Level vs. Low-Level: Oozie is a high-level workflow coordination system that abstracts the underlying details of the data processing frameworks, providing a simplified approach to managing job orchestration. Yarn, on the other hand, is a low-level resource management framework that allows fine-grained control over resources, giving more flexibility but requiring users to explicitly manage resource allocation and scheduling.

  4. Granularity of Management: Oozie manages workflows at a higher level, focusing on overall job coordination and dependencies, while Yarn manages resources at a more granular level, allowing fine-grained control over resource allocation and usage.

  5. Dependency and Job Scheduling: Oozie provides advanced features for managing dependencies between jobs and scheduling complex workflows, allowing users to define job dependencies and specify conditions for job execution. Yarn, on the other hand, focuses on resource management and doesn't provide built-in features for managing job dependencies and scheduling workflows.

  6. User Community and Adoption: Oozie has been widely adopted and has a strong user community, with extensive documentation and tutorials available. Yarn, as a core component of the Hadoop ecosystem, is widely used in many big data processing frameworks and has a large user community as well.

In summary, Apache Oozie is a workflow scheduling system for managing Hadoop jobs and provides advanced features for job coordination and scheduling, while Apache Yarn is a resource management framework that focuses on efficient resource allocation and utilization in a Hadoop cluster.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Oozie, Yarn

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
zen-li
zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

ReviewonYarnYarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Oozie
Apache Oozie
Yarn
Yarn

It is a server-based workflow scheduling system to manage Hadoop jobs. Workflows in it are defined as a collection of control flow and action nodes in a directed acyclic graph. Control flow nodes define the beginning and the end of a workflow as well as a mechanism to control the workflow execution path.

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
41.5K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.7K
Stacks
40
Stacks
28.2K
Followers
76
Followers
13.5K
Votes
0
Votes
151
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 85
    Incredibly fast
  • 22
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Can install any npm package
  • 8
    Works where npm fails
Cons
  • 16
    Facebook
  • 7
    Sends data to facebook
  • 4
    Should be installed separately
  • 3
    Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
No integrations available
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to Apache Oozie, Yarn?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot