Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MediatR vs Apache Pulsar: What are the differences?
MediatR: In-process messaging with no dependencies. It is a low-ambition library trying to solve a simple problem — decoupling the in-process sending of messages from handling messages. Cross-platform, supporting .NET Framework 4.6.1 and netstandard2.0; Apache Pulsar: Distributed solution providing messaging and queuing for streaming data. Apache Pulsar is a distributed messaging solution developed and released to open source at Yahoo. Pulsar supports both pub-sub messaging and queuing in a platform designed for performance, scalability, and ease of development and operation.
MediatR and Apache Pulsar can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.
Apache Pulsar is an open source tool with 6.49K GitHub stars and 1.56K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Apache Pulsar's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of Apache Pulsar
- Simple7
- Scalable4
- High-throughput3
- Geo-replication2
- Multi-tenancy2
- Pulsar Functions1
- Secure1
- Stream SQL1
- Horizontally scaleable1
- Easy to deploy1
- Fast1
Pros of MediatR
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Pulsar
- Very few commercial vendors for support1
- LImited Language support(6)1
- No one and only one delivery1
- No guaranteed dliefvery1
- Not jms compliant1
- Only Supports Topics1
Cons of MediatR
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Apache Pulsar?
What is MediatR?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Apache Pulsar?
What companies use MediatR?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Apache Pulsar?
What tools integrate with MediatR?
Blog Posts
+5