StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Serialization Frameworks
  5. Apache Thrift vs Serde

Apache Thrift vs Serde

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Stacks193
Followers245
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks4.1K
Serde
Serde
Stacks113
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars10.1K
Forks863

Apache Thrift vs Serde: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Apache Thrift and Serde are two widely used frameworks for serializing and deserializing data in various programming languages. While both serve the purpose of data serialization, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Supported Languages: One of the significant differences between Apache Thrift and Serde is the range of supported programming languages. Apache Thrift supports a wider range of languages, including C++, Java, Python, Go, Ruby, and many more, while Serde is primarily focused on the Rust programming language.

  2. Ease of Use and Flexibility: Serde is often seen as a more lightweight and beginner-friendly framework, with a simpler API and easy integration with Rust. On the other hand, Apache Thrift offers a more powerful and feature-rich set of APIs, providing greater flexibility for complex serialization and deserialization requirements.

  3. Protocol Support: Apache Thrift employs a custom binary protocol for data serialization, which offers high performance and efficient data transfer. In contrast, Serde does not have a built-in protocol but instead focuses on providing a flexible and efficient data representation format.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Thrift has a large and active community and a mature ecosystem of plugins, tools, and libraries developed around it. This broad community support allows for extensive documentation, tutorials, and community-driven improvements. Serde, while still popular within the Rust ecosystem, has a smaller community and a more focused set of resources.

  5. Error Handling and Compatibility: Apache Thrift provides built-in error handling mechanisms, making it easier to handle exceptions and errors during serialization and deserialization operations. Serde, being more lightweight, relies on Rust's native error handling mechanisms. Additionally, Apache Thrift offers backward compatibility guarantees, ensuring smooth data migration between different versions of serialized data structures.

  6. Customization and Extensibility: Apache Thrift provides a rich set of code generation tools, allowing developers to customize the generated code for their specific use cases. This enables finer control over the generated serialization and deserialization code. Serde, being a native Rust library, also allows customization using attributes and derives.

In summary, Apache Thrift offers support for a wider range of programming languages, has a more extensive ecosystem, and provides a custom binary protocol, while Serde is primarily focused on Rust, offers simplicity and flexibility, and does not provide a built-in protocol.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Serde
Serde

The Apache Thrift software framework, for scalable cross-language services development, combines a software stack with a code generation engine to build services that work efficiently and seamlessly between C++, Java, Python, PHP, Ruby, Erlang, Perl, Haskell, C#, Cocoa, JavaScript, Node.js, Smalltalk, OCaml and Delphi and other languages.

It is a framework for serializing and deserializing Rust data structures efficiently and generically. The ecosystem consists of data structures that know how to serialize and deserialize themselves along with data formats that know how to serialize and deserialize other things. It provides the layer by which these two groups interact with each other, allowing any supported data structure to be serialized and deserialized using any supported data format.

-
Serializing and deserializing Rust data structures; Efficient
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Stars
10.1K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
863
Stacks
193
Stacks
113
Followers
245
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Apache Thrift, Serde?

MessagePack

MessagePack

It is an efficient binary serialization format. It lets you exchange data among multiple languages like JSON. But it's faster and smaller. Small integers are encoded into a single byte, and typical short strings require only one extra byte in addition to the strings themselves.

Protobuf

Protobuf

Protocol buffers are Google's language-neutral, platform-neutral, extensible mechanism for serializing structured data – think XML, but smaller, faster, and simpler.

Avro

Avro

It is a row-oriented remote procedure call and data serialization framework developed within Apache's Hadoop project. It uses JSON for defining data types and protocols, and serializes data in a compact binary format.

Sonic

Sonic

It is a blazingly fast JSON serializing & deserializing library, accelerated by JIT (just-in-time compiling) and SIMD (single-instruction-multiple-data).

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase