Apigee vs Charles

Overview

Charles

Stacks140

Followers167

Votes0

Apigee

Stacks240

Followers691

Votes30

Apigee vs Charles: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Apigee and Charles

**1. Protocol Support:** Apigee is primarily designed for API management, supporting RESTful APIs, SOAP services, and GraphQL, providing extensive features for API creation, management, and analytics. In contrast, Charles is a web debugging proxy tool that focuses on monitoring and debugging HTTP and SSL traffic between clients and servers.

**2. Usage Focus:** Apigee is more suited for enterprise-level API management tasks, including security, scalability, and developer support, while Charles is more geared towards individual developers and QA professionals for debugging and analyzing web traffic on a smaller scale.

**3. Deployment:** Apigee is typically used in cloud environments as a PaaS solution with features like API monetization and developer portal capabilities, whereas Charles is a desktop application that can be used locally for debugging web applications.

**4. Compatibility:** Apigee provides cross-platform support with cloud-based services accessible through web browsers, while Charles is available as a standalone application for macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems.

**5. Pricing Model:** Apigee follows a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on usage and features, including a free tier for small-scale usage, whereas Charles offers a one-time paid license for unlimited usage on a single machine.

**6. Learning Curve:** Apigee involves a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and comprehensive API management capabilities, requiring training and expertise for effective utilization, whereas Charles is relatively easy to set up and use for basic web traffic analysis and debugging tasks.

In Summary, Apigee and Charles differ in protocol support, usage focus, deployment options, compatibility, pricing models, and learning curves, catering to distinct needs in API management and web traffic debugging.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Charles	Apigee
Charles is a web proxy (HTTP Proxy / HTTP Monitor) that runs on your own computer. Your web browser (or any other Internet application) is then configured to access the Internet through Charles, and Charles is then able to record and display for you all of the data that is sent and received.	API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.
SSL Proxying – view SSL requests and responses in plain text;Bandwidth Throttling to simulate slower Internet connections including latency;AJAX debugging – view XML and JSON requests and responses as a tree or as text;AMF – view the contents of Flash Remoting / Flex Remoting messages as a tree;Repeat requests to test back-end changes;Edit requests to test different inputs;Breakpoints to intercept and edit requests or responses;Validate recorded HTML, CSS and RSS/atom responses using the W3C validator	Design, secure, analyze, and scale your APIs with the Apigee Edge API management platform.; Predictive analytics to ensure intelligent and customized interactions.; Connect devices to the Internet, and enable partners and developers to access device functionality and data with APIs.; Protect your apps from cyber threats and bad bots with data-driven enterprise grade API security.
Statistics
Stacks 140	Stacks 240
Followers 167	Followers 691
Votes 0	Votes 30
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 12 Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform 6 Quick jumpstart 6 Good documentation 3 Easy to use 3 Fast and adjustable caching Cons 11 Expensive 1 Doesn't support hybrid natively

What are some alternatives to Charles, Apigee?

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Hoppscotch

It is a free, fast and beautiful API request builder. It helps you create requests faster, saving precious time on development

Falcor

Falcor lets you represent all your remote data sources as a single domain model via a virtual JSON graph. You code the same way no matter where the data is, whether in memory on the client or over the network on the server.

DuckRails

DuckRails is an open source development tool that helps developer mock API endpoints quickly & dynamically outside the application code.

Related Comparisons

Apigee vs Charles: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Apigee and Charles

**1. Protocol Support:** Apigee is primarily designed for API management, supporting RESTful APIs, SOAP services, and GraphQL, providing extensive features for API creation, management, and analytics. In contrast, Charles is a web debugging proxy tool that focuses on monitoring and debugging HTTP and SSL traffic between clients and servers.

**2. Usage Focus:** Apigee is more suited for enterprise-level API management tasks, including security, scalability, and developer support, while Charles is more geared towards individual developers and QA professionals for debugging and analyzing web traffic on a smaller scale.

**3. Deployment:** Apigee is typically used in cloud environments as a PaaS solution with features like API monetization and developer portal capabilities, whereas Charles is a desktop application that can be used locally for debugging web applications.

**4. Compatibility:** Apigee provides cross-platform support with cloud-based services accessible through web browsers, while Charles is available as a standalone application for macOS, Windows, and Linux operating systems.

**5. Pricing Model:** Apigee follows a subscription-based pricing model with different plans based on usage and features, including a free tier for small-scale usage, whereas Charles offers a one-time paid license for unlimited usage on a single machine.

**6. Learning Curve:** Apigee involves a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and comprehensive API management capabilities, requiring training and expertise for effective utilization, whereas Charles is relatively easy to set up and use for basic web traffic analysis and debugging tasks.

Apigee vs Charles

Overview