Appcelerator vs Flutter

Overview

Appcelerator

Stacks53

Followers70

Votes27

Flutter

Stacks17.7K

Followers16.8K

Votes1.2K

GitHub Stars173.7K

Forks29.4K

Appcelerator vs Flutter: What are the differences?

1. Language and Framework: Appcelerator uses JavaScript and is based on a hybrid architecture, combining native and web technologies, while Flutter uses Dart and is based on a fully native architecture, using the Skia rendering engine.
2. Development Speed: Appcelerator allows for quicker development as it uses a single codebase to build apps for multiple platforms, while Flutter offers a faster development experience with its hot reload feature, allowing developers to see changes instantly.
3. User Interface: Appcelerator uses native UI components for each platform, resulting in a more native-like user interface, while Flutter uses its own set of UI components that offer a consistent look and feel across different platforms.
4. Performance and Responsiveness: Appcelerator apps tend to have better performance and responsiveness, as they leverage native components and capabilities, while Flutter apps may have a slight overhead due to the abstraction layer introduced by the Flutter framework.
5. Community and Ecosystem: Appcelerator has a larger and more established community, with a wide range of plugins and third-party libraries available, while Flutter is growing rapidly in popularity and has an active community, but may have a smaller ecosystem compared to Appcelerator.
6. Learning Curve: Appcelerator has a steeper learning curve, especially for developers not familiar with JavaScript or web technologies, while Flutter has a relatively easier learning curve, as it offers a more straightforward and modern development approach with Dart.

In Summary, Appcelerator and Flutter have key differences in language and framework, development speed, user interface, performance and responsiveness, community and ecosystem, and learning curve.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Appcelerator, Flutter

Nick

CTO at Pickio

Jun 2, 2020

Decided

We built the first version of our app with RN and it turned out a mess in a while. A lot of bugs along with poor performance out of the box for a fairly large app. Many things, that native platform has, cannot be done with existing solutions for RN. For instance, large titles on iOS are not fully implemented in any of existing navigations libraries. Also there's painfully slow JSON bridge and many other small, yet annoying things. On the other hand Flutter became a really powerful and easy-to-use tool. A bit of a learning curve, of course, because of Dart, but it worth learning. Flutter offers TONS of built-in features, no JSON-bridge, AOT compilation for iOS.

491k views491k

Comments

Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k

Comments

Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided

Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
Easy to learn & deployed production
Fast development
Strong community
Completed Documents
Native performance with lower RAM used.
Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
Powered by Facebook.

666k views666k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Appcelerator	Flutter
Appcelerator is the first mobile platform to combine the flexibility of open source development technologies with the power of cloud services.	Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.
Library of over 20 pre-built common services that are both proven and robust, to reduce integration time and risk, services such as push notification, status updates, photo storage, and social integration, or create your own custom cloud services.;Client-side APIs for any development platform (e.g. Titanium, iOS SDK, Android SDK);Extensibility enabling you to build your own custom cloud application development services in Node.js on the Appcelerator cloud for all your mobile apps.	Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 173.7K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 29.4K
Stacks 53	Stacks 17.7K
Followers 70	Followers 16.8K
Votes 27	Votes 1.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros 5 Android 4 Open Source 4 Easy to learn 2 IOS 2 Javascript Cons 1 No online IDE	Pros 149 Hot Reload 126 Cross platform 107 Performance 90 Backed by Google 74 Compiled into Native Code Cons 29 Need to learn Dart 11 Lack of community support 10 No 3D Graphics Engine Support 8 Graphics programming 6 Lack of friendly documentation
Integrations
Crittercism Urban Airship New Relic Hipmob Red Hat OpenShift	Android SDK Firebase Dart

What are some alternatives to Appcelerator, Flutter?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Parse

With Parse, you can add a scalable and powerful backend in minutes and launch a full-featured app in record time without ever worrying about server management. We offer push notifications, social integration, data storage, and the ability to add rich custom logic to your app’s backend with Cloud Code.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

built.io

Built.io Backend is an mBaaS that allows you to avoid designing, building, and supporting a custom backend for your mobile & web applications. Enterprises can dramatically reduce cost, lower risk and accelerate time-to-market for apps.

Related Comparisons

Appcelerator vs Flutter: What are the differences?

1. Language and Framework: Appcelerator uses JavaScript and is based on a hybrid architecture, combining native and web technologies, while Flutter uses Dart and is based on a fully native architecture, using the Skia rendering engine.
2. Development Speed: Appcelerator allows for quicker development as it uses a single codebase to build apps for multiple platforms, while Flutter offers a faster development experience with its hot reload feature, allowing developers to see changes instantly.
3. User Interface: Appcelerator uses native UI components for each platform, resulting in a more native-like user interface, while Flutter uses its own set of UI components that offer a consistent look and feel across different platforms.
4. Performance and Responsiveness: Appcelerator apps tend to have better performance and responsiveness, as they leverage native components and capabilities, while Flutter apps may have a slight overhead due to the abstraction layer introduced by the Flutter framework.
5. Community and Ecosystem: Appcelerator has a larger and more established community, with a wide range of plugins and third-party libraries available, while Flutter is growing rapidly in popularity and has an active community, but may have a smaller ecosystem compared to Appcelerator.
6. Learning Curve: Appcelerator has a steeper learning curve, especially for developers not familiar with JavaScript or web technologies, while Flutter has a relatively easier learning curve, as it offers a more straightforward and modern development approach with Dart.

In Summary, Appcelerator and Flutter have key differences in language and framework, development speed, user interface, performance and responsiveness, community and ecosystem, and learning curve.

Appcelerator vs Flutter

Overview