StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. Appium vs Kobiton

Appium vs Kobiton

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K
Kobiton
Kobiton
Stacks25
Followers66
Votes0

Appium vs Kobiton: What are the differences?

Introduction

Appium and Kobiton are both mobile automation testing tools used for testing mobile applications. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different types of testing scenarios.

  1. Technology Stack: Appium is an open-source mobile automation tool that uses WebDriver protocol and supports various programming languages such as Java, Python, and Ruby. On the other hand, Kobiton is a cloud-based mobile testing platform that provides access to real devices and supports Appium as well as other automation frameworks like Selenium and XCUITest.

  2. Device Support: Appium has extensive device support and can work with both Android and iOS devices. It can also work with emulators, simulators, and real devices. Kobiton, being a cloud-based platform, offers a wide range of real devices for testing, including the latest Android and iOS devices, which can be accessed remotely for testing purposes.

  3. Parallel Execution: Appium allows parallel execution of tests on multiple devices, which can help in reducing the overall test execution time. It provides the flexibility to run tests concurrently on different devices. In comparison, Kobiton also supports parallel execution but provides additional features like test scheduling and load testing, enabling efficient distribution of test execution across multiple devices.

  4. Device Management: Appium requires manual device management, where devices need to be connected to the test machine physically. It can also use cloud-based device providers for remote testing. In contrast, Kobiton eliminates the need for physical device connectivity as it provides a cloud-based infrastructure to access and manage devices remotely. It offers features like device provisioning, device groups, and device termination to simplify device management.

  5. Reporting and Analytics: Appium provides basic test result reporting capabilities, but it requires additional plugins or third-party tools for in-depth reporting and analytics. On the other hand, Kobiton offers comprehensive reporting and analytics features out of the box. It provides detailed test result reports, logs, and performance metrics, allowing testers to gain insights into test execution and identify potential issues easily.

  6. Pricing Model: Appium is an open-source tool and is available for free. It provides flexibility in terms of environment setup and configuration. Kobiton, being a cloud-based platform, offers different pricing plans based on the number of concurrent sessions, devices, and additional features. It provides a cost-effective solution for businesses that require access to a wide range of real devices without the need for physical infrastructure.

In summary, while both Appium and Kobiton are mobile automation testing tools, they differ in terms of technology stack, device support, parallel execution, device management, reporting and analytics capabilities, and pricing model. Appium is a versatile open-source tool, suitable for different types of testing scenarios, while Kobiton provides a cloud-based platform with additional features and device management capabilities for efficient mobile testing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appium
Appium
Kobiton
Kobiton

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

It enables developers and testers to perform automated and manual testing of mobile apps and websites on real devices. Modern DevOps and Quality environments require apps to be tested on hundreds of device/OS/browser combinations. Managing an in-house device-lab is expensive, resource intensive, restrictive and very manual. Kobiton allows for instant provisioning of real devices for testing with automated or manual scripts, and also allows current on-premise devices to be plugged in to form a holistic testing cloud.

Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Automated or manual tests on real devices; Rich test logs; Public, Private or Hybrid cloud support; Support for all major CI/CD tools and processes
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
650
Stacks
25
Followers
574
Followers
66
Votes
28
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Active community
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
Cons
  • 1
    Limited minutes
Integrations
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
CircleCI
CircleCI
Travis CI
Travis CI
Jenkins
Jenkins
TeamCity
TeamCity

What are some alternatives to Appium, Kobiton?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana