StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Low Code Platforms
  5. AppSheet vs Google App Maker

AppSheet vs Google App Maker

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
Stacks177
Followers237
Votes0
AppSheet
AppSheet
Stacks39
Followers63
Votes0

AppSheet vs Google App Maker: What are the differences?

Introduction

AppSheet and Google App Maker are two platforms that allow users to create custom applications without the need for extensive coding skills. While both platforms serve similar purposes, there are key differences that set them apart.

  1. Integration with Google Workspace: One of the key differences between AppSheet and Google App Maker is their integration with Google Workspace. AppSheet provides deep integration with various Google Workspace tools, such as Google Sheets, Google Drive, and Google Calendar. This allows users to easily leverage the data and functionality of these tools within their applications. On the other hand, Google App Maker, being a native Google product, offers seamless integration with other Google services, including Google Cloud Platform and Google Cloud SQL. This integration provides users with advanced data storage and management options.

  2. Data Source Connectivity: Another significant difference lies in the data source connectivity options. AppSheet supports a wide range of data sources, including spreadsheets, databases, APIs, and cloud storage services. This allows users to connect their applications to various data sources and sync data in real-time. In contrast, Google App Maker primarily focuses on integrating with Google Cloud services, such as Google Cloud SQL and Google Sheets.

  3. Development Approach: AppSheet follows a no-code development approach, empowering users to create applications using a visual interface and predefined templates. It offers a wide range of pre-built features and actions that can be customized to meet specific requirements. Google App Maker, on the other hand, follows a low-code development approach. While it also provides a visual editor, users have more control over the customization and can write code if needed. This makes Google App Maker suitable for users with some coding knowledge who want more flexibility in application development.

  4. Deployment Options: When it comes to deployment, AppSheet offers multi-platform support, allowing users to create applications for both web and mobile platforms. Users can easily distribute their applications via web browsers, native iOS and Android apps, or even embed them into webpages. In comparison, Google App Maker only supports web-based deployment, restricting users to web browser access for their applications.

  5. User Interface Design: AppSheet provides a range of pre-designed templates and themes to help users quickly create visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces. Users can customize the design elements to match their branding and create a consistent look and feel across their applications. Google App Maker offers a more generic interface design, giving users the freedom to create custom UI elements from scratch. This makes it suitable for users who require highly customized and unique user interfaces.

  6. Community and Support: AppSheet has a strong community of users and developers who actively engage in forums, share knowledge, and provide support to fellow users. The community-driven support helps users troubleshoot issues, gain insights, and discover best practices. Google App Maker, being a Google product, benefits from the wider Google Developers community and resources, ensuring access to documentation, tutorials, and support from Google's extensive knowledge base.

In summary, AppSheet and Google App Maker differ in their integration with Google Workspace, data source connectivity, development approach, deployment options, user interface design, and community and support. These differences make each platform suitable for different user requirements, whether it be deep integration with Google services, flexibility in development, multi-platform deployment, customizable UI design, or access to a supportive community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Google App Maker
Google App Maker
AppSheet
AppSheet

App Maker lets you develop powerful apps with relative ease. Create a model to manage your data, build a UI in the visual editor, use Apps Script to write some scripts, and you're on your way.

It is a no-code platform trusted by over 200,000 app creators around the world. Common use cases include field service and data capture, transportation, compliance reports, delivery tracking, property surveys, and a whole lot more.

-
No-Code; Create and deploy multi-platform apps in real-time; Deliver a rich user experience with a robust feature set
Statistics
Stacks
177
Stacks
39
Followers
237
Followers
63
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
G Suite
G Suite
Google Cloud SQL
Google Cloud SQL
Google Sheets
Google Sheets
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Smartsheet
Smartsheet
Google Forms
Google Forms
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel

What are some alternatives to Google App Maker, AppSheet?

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Stamplay

Stamplay

The API-based development platform enabling developers to do 80% of the job in 1% of the time thanks to: out of the box APIs for users and data, one-click integration with any API, scalable infrastructure and SDKs. Build Rome in a day.

Kumologica

Kumologica

It is the first low-code development solution that run your integration and automation services serverlessly on any cloud. It provides drag and drop visual designer and low code approach to ensure the greatest speed and flexibility to support a wide range of integrations compatible with most of the platforms and cloud providers.

Backand

Backand

Backand is a powerful backend-as-a-service for AngularJS that provides out-of-the-box social login, push notifications, Ionic integration and much more.

Bubble

Bubble

It is a visual programming language that lets you build a fully-functional web app without writing code. Users have built marketplaces, CRM tools, social networks. Engineers can focus on new features and add them as plugins with code, while business people can focus on the customer-facing product.

Stacker

Stacker

Stacker lets you turn your spreadsheets into applications. You plug in your Airtable or Google Sheets and Stacker automatically generates you app with login, forms and buttons. Stacker includes built in permissions, UI and business logic.

Magic xpa

Magic xpa

It enables rapid creation of cross-platform business applications for desktop, web and mobile, so you can take advantage of new business opportunities quickly and on-demand.

Sheety

Sheety

Power websites, apps, or whatever you like, all from a spreadsheet. Changes to your spreadsheet update your API in realtime.

Draftbit

Draftbit

Create, customize, launch, and iterate on your mobile app, all from your browser. Source code included.

Knack

Knack

Build simple web apps like a member directory, job listings, employee time tracking, business directory, contact directory, product catalogue, or equipment tracker.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase