Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ArangoDB vs RocksDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
ArangoDB and RocksDB are both popular databases used in various applications. However, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.
Data Model: ArangoDB is a multi-model database that supports documents, graphs, and key-value pairs within a single database. On the other hand, RocksDB is a key-value store that is mainly used as an embedded database within other systems, providing high-performance storage for key-value pairs.
Query Language: ArangoDB uses its query language called AQL (ArangoDB Query Language) which allows users to leverage the power of SQL-like queries for different data models. In contrast, RocksDB does not have a query language of its own, and the interaction with the database is usually done through a key-value API or other interfaces provided by the host system.
Scalability: ArangoDB is designed to be a distributed database from the ground up, allowing for easy horizontal scaling across multiple servers. RocksDB, on the other hand, is mainly used as an embedded database within single servers or applications, limiting its scalability options compared to ArangoDB.
Consistency and Durability: ArangoDB provides options for users to choose between different levels of consistency (from eventual consistency to strong consistency) and offers various durability options to suit different use cases. RocksDB focuses on providing high performance and durability through features like write-ahead logging, but the consistency model is often determined by the application using RocksDB.
Community and Ecosystem: ArangoDB has a thriving community that actively contributes to the development of the database, and it also has a wide range of plugins and integrations available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, RocksDB, being primarily an embedded database, relies heavily on the ecosystem of the host system it is integrated with, which may vary in terms of support and plugins available.
Use Cases: Due to its multi-model capabilities, ArangoDB is well-suited for applications that require handling diverse types of data and relationships between them, such as social networks or content management systems. RocksDB, with its focus on high-performance key-value storage, is commonly used in applications that require fast and efficient data access, such as caching systems or distributed storage engines.
In Summary, ArangoDB and RocksDB differ in terms of data model support, query language, scalability, consistency, community support, and use cases, making them suitable for different types of applications.
I am researching different querying solutions to handle ~1 trillion records of data (in the realm of a petabyte). The data is mostly textual. I have identified a few options: Milvus, HBase, RocksDB, and Elasticsearch. I was wondering if there is a good way to compare the performance of these options (or if anyone has already done something like this). I want to be able to compare the speed of ingesting and querying textual data from these tools. Does anyone have information on this or know where I can find some? Thanks in advance!
You've probably come to a decision already but for those reading...here are some resources we put together to help people learn more about Milvus and other databases https://zilliz.com/comparison and https://github.com/zilliztech/VectorDBBench. I don't think they include RocksDB or HBase yet (you could could recommend on GitHub) but hopefully they help answer your Elastic Search questions.
Hello All, I'm building an app that will enable users to create documents using ckeditor or TinyMCE editor. The data is then stored in a database and retrieved to display to the user, these docs can contain image data also. The number of pages generated for a single document can go up to 1000. Therefore by design, each page is stored in a separate JSON. I'm wondering which database is the right one to choose between ArangoDB and PostgreSQL. Your thoughts, advice please. Thanks, Kashyap
Which Graph DB features are you planning to use?
Pros of ArangoDB
- Grahps and documents in one DB37
- Intuitive and rich query language26
- Good documentation25
- Open source25
- Joins for collections21
- Foxx is great platform15
- Great out of the box web interface with API playground14
- Good driver support6
- Low maintenance efforts6
- Clustering6
- Easy microservice creation with foxx5
- You can write true backendless apps4
- Managed solution available2
- Performance0
Pros of RocksDB
- Very fast5
- Made by Facebook3
- Consistent performance2
- Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ArangoDB
- Web ui has still room for improvement3
- No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL2
Cons of RocksDB
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is ArangoDB?
What is RocksDB?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use ArangoDB?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with ArangoDB?
What tools integrate with RocksDB?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+5
+3
+6
+42