StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. ArangoDB vs RocksDB

ArangoDB vs RocksDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Stacks273
Followers442
Votes192
RocksDB
RocksDB
Stacks141
Followers290
Votes11
GitHub Stars30.9K
Forks6.6K

ArangoDB vs RocksDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

ArangoDB and RocksDB are both popular databases used in various applications. However, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Data Model: ArangoDB is a multi-model database that supports documents, graphs, and key-value pairs within a single database. On the other hand, RocksDB is a key-value store that is mainly used as an embedded database within other systems, providing high-performance storage for key-value pairs.

  2. Query Language: ArangoDB uses its query language called AQL (ArangoDB Query Language) which allows users to leverage the power of SQL-like queries for different data models. In contrast, RocksDB does not have a query language of its own, and the interaction with the database is usually done through a key-value API or other interfaces provided by the host system.

  3. Scalability: ArangoDB is designed to be a distributed database from the ground up, allowing for easy horizontal scaling across multiple servers. RocksDB, on the other hand, is mainly used as an embedded database within single servers or applications, limiting its scalability options compared to ArangoDB.

  4. Consistency and Durability: ArangoDB provides options for users to choose between different levels of consistency (from eventual consistency to strong consistency) and offers various durability options to suit different use cases. RocksDB focuses on providing high performance and durability through features like write-ahead logging, but the consistency model is often determined by the application using RocksDB.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: ArangoDB has a thriving community that actively contributes to the development of the database, and it also has a wide range of plugins and integrations available to extend its functionality. On the other hand, RocksDB, being primarily an embedded database, relies heavily on the ecosystem of the host system it is integrated with, which may vary in terms of support and plugins available.

  6. Use Cases: Due to its multi-model capabilities, ArangoDB is well-suited for applications that require handling diverse types of data and relationships between them, such as social networks or content management systems. RocksDB, with its focus on high-performance key-value storage, is commonly used in applications that require fast and efficient data access, such as caching systems or distributed storage engines.

In Summary, ArangoDB and RocksDB differ in terms of data model support, query language, scalability, consistency, community support, and use cases, making them suitable for different types of applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ArangoDB, RocksDB

D
D

Feb 9, 2022

Needs adviceonMilvusMilvusHBaseHBaseRocksDBRocksDB

I am researching different querying solutions to handle ~1 trillion records of data (in the realm of a petabyte). The data is mostly textual. I have identified a few options: Milvus, HBase, RocksDB, and Elasticsearch. I was wondering if there is a good way to compare the performance of these options (or if anyone has already done something like this). I want to be able to compare the speed of ingesting and querying textual data from these tools. Does anyone have information on this or know where I can find some? Thanks in advance!

174k views174k
Comments
gitgkk
gitgkk

Oct 19, 2021

Needs adviceonTinyMCETinyMCEJSONJSONArangoDBArangoDB

Hello All, I'm building an app that will enable users to create documents using ckeditor or TinyMCE editor. The data is then stored in a database and retrieved to display to the user, these docs can contain image data also. The number of pages generated for a single document can go up to 1000. Therefore by design, each page is stored in a separate JSON. I'm wondering which database is the right one to choose between ArangoDB and PostgreSQL. Your thoughts, advice please. Thanks, Kashyap

64.3k views64.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
RocksDB
RocksDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

RocksDB is an embeddable persistent key-value store for fast storage. RocksDB can also be the foundation for a client-server database but our current focus is on embedded workloads. RocksDB builds on LevelDB to be scalable to run on servers with many CPU cores, to efficiently use fast storage, to support IO-bound, in-memory and write-once workloads, and to be flexible to allow for innovation.

multi-model nosql db; acid; transactions; javascript; database; nosql; sharding; replication; query language; joins; aql; documents; graphs; key-values; graphdb
Designed for application servers wanting to store up to a few terabytes of data on locally attached Flash drives or in RAM;Optimized for storing small to medium size key-values on fast storage -- flash devices or in-memory;Scales linearly with number of CPUs so that it works well on ARM processors
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
30.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.6K
Stacks
273
Stacks
141
Followers
442
Followers
290
Votes
192
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Grahps and documents in one DB
  • 26
    Intuitive and rich query language
  • 25
    Good documentation
  • 25
    Open source
  • 21
    Joins for collections
Cons
  • 3
    Web ui has still room for improvement
  • 2
    No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL
Pros
  • 5
    Very fast
  • 3
    Made by Facebook
  • 2
    Consistent performance
  • 1
    Ability to add logic to the database layer where needed

What are some alternatives to ArangoDB, RocksDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase