Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ArangoDB vs Umbra: What are the differences?
Developers describe ArangoDB as "A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values". A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions. On the other hand, Umbra is detailed as "An ACID-compliant database built for in-memory analytics speed". It is a fully ACID-compliant database built for in-memory analytics speed. For out-of-core processing it falls back gracefully to flash-based storage. Featuring fast code generation, low-latency query execution, and drop-in PostgreSQL compatibility.
ArangoDB and Umbra can be categorized as "Databases" tools.
Some of the features offered by ArangoDB are:
- multi-model nosql db
- acid
- transactions
On the other hand, Umbra provides the following key features:
- Low-Overhead Buffer Manager
- Low-Latency Query Compilation
- Compact Intermediate Representation
ArangoDB is an open source tool with 9.2K GitHub stars and 610 GitHub forks. Here's a link to ArangoDB's open source repository on GitHub.
Pros of ArangoDB
- Grahps and documents in one DB37
- Intuitive and rich query language26
- Good documentation25
- Open source25
- Joins for collections21
- Foxx is great platform15
- Great out of the box web interface with API playground14
- Good driver support6
- Low maintenance efforts6
- Clustering6
- Easy microservice creation with foxx5
- You can write true backendless apps4
- Managed solution available2
- Performance0
Pros of Umbra
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ArangoDB
- Web ui has still room for improvement3
- No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL2