Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Arch Linux vs Kali Linux: What are the differences?
Introduction
Arch Linux and Kali Linux are both popular Linux distributions that cater to different user needs. While Arch Linux focuses on simplicity, customization, and bleeding-edge software, Kali Linux is specifically designed for penetration testing and digital forensics. Here are the key differences between Arch Linux and Kali Linux:
Target audience: Arch Linux is primarily aimed at experienced Linux users who prefer a do-it-yourself approach to system configuration and maintenance. It is highly customizable and provides more control over the system. On the other hand, Kali Linux is tailored for cybersecurity professionals and enthusiasts who require a specialized operating system for penetration testing and security auditing.
Software repositories: Arch Linux follows a rolling-release model, which means that updates are constantly released and users can always have the latest software versions. Its software repositories, known as the Arch User Repository (AUR), contain a vast collection of community-contributed packages. In contrast, Kali Linux focuses on stability and security and does not follow a rolling-release model. Its software repositories contain a curated set of tools specific to security testing and forensics.
Installation process: Arch Linux has a unique installation process that involves manually configuring and installing individual packages. It provides a bare-bones system that users can customize according to their preferences. In contrast, Kali Linux offers a user-friendly installer that includes preconfigured tools and sets up the system for security testing out of the box.
Default desktop environment: Arch Linux does not provide a default desktop environment; users have the freedom to choose and configure their preferred desktop environment or window manager. This gives users full control over their system's look and feel. On the other hand, Kali Linux comes with the GNOME desktop environment by default. While it can be customized, the focus remains on security tools rather than aesthetics.
Documentation and community support: Arch Linux has an extensive and well-documented wiki that provides detailed instructions on various topics. It also has an active and knowledgeable community that can offer support and help with troubleshooting. Kali Linux, on the other hand, has a dedicated forum and documentation specifically focused on security testing and forensics. While it may not have as vast a community as Arch Linux, it caters to its target audience effectively.
Main purpose: Arch Linux aims to provide a minimalist and lightweight Linux distribution that gives users complete control over their system. It is suitable for advanced users who enjoy the process of building and customizing their Linux environment. On the other hand, Kali Linux is designed to be a specialized operating system for security testing, penetration testing, and digital forensics. It comes bundled with a wide range of preinstalled security tools and utilities that aid in ethical hacking and security research.
In summary, Arch Linux is a versatile and highly customizable Linux distribution suitable for experienced users who prefer a hands-on approach. Kali Linux, on the other hand, is specifically designed for professionals and enthusiasts in the field of cybersecurity, providing a preconfigured environment with an extensive set of security tools.
At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.
Pros of Arch Linux
- Large Community17
- Package Manager15
- Customizable13
- Rolling Release12
- Arch User Repository11
- Bleeding Edge11
- Extensive Documentation10
- Arch Build System8
- X86_64 architecture supported7
- Can fix bugs yourself if you know how to4
Pros of Kali Linux
- Penetration testing tools are pre-installed8
- Has many penetration testing tools8
- Runs on both x86 and ARM platforms5
- Its just debian so it has better support3
- There's no restrictions1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Arch Linux
- Systemd only4
- Only X86_64 architecture is offically supported3
- No Guided Installation1
- System maintenance1
- Unstable1
- Comparatively fewer offically supported packages1
Cons of Kali Linux
- Wireless driver issues on some systems3
- Packages are too large in size as compare to alpine3
- Outdated versions of common packages3
- Root GUI setup is a potential security hole2