Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Argo

621
435
+ 1
6
Fleet

8
40
+ 1
0
Add tool

Argo vs Fleet: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the world of Kubernetes, both Argo and Fleet are popular tools for managing applications and clusters. While both serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between them. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand when to use each tool.

  1. Installation and Architecture: Argo follows a client-server architecture where it requires installation and configuration of a central server component. On the other hand, Fleet uses a more decentralized approach and can be installed as a lightweight client component on each cluster.

  2. GitOps vs ClusterOps: Argo primarily focuses on GitOps workflows, enabling teams to manage their applications and configuration files using Git repositories. Fleet, on the other hand, is more focused on managing clusters and infrastructure, allowing you to maintain multiple clusters simultaneously.

  3. Flexibility vs Standardization: Argo provides a higher degree of flexibility, allowing you to define custom workflows and specify fine-grained details of your application deployments. Fleet, on the other hand, follows a more standardized approach, providing a set of predefined workflows and configuration options for managing clusters.

  4. UI vs CLI: Argo has a web-based user interface that allows users to interact with the tool visually. It provides a rich set of features like application visualization and on-demand job execution. Fleet, on the other hand, is primarily driven through a command-line interface (CLI) and does not have a dedicated web interface.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Argo has a larger and more active community, which has resulted in a broader range of integrations and plugins. It is well-documented and has a vibrant ecosystem of contributors. Fleet, being a newer tool, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.

  6. Maturity and Stability: Argo has been around for a longer time and has gained maturity with each release. It has been extensively tested and is considered to be a stable tool for managing applications in Kubernetes. Fleet, being a relatively new tool, may have fewer features and stability concerns due to its evolving nature.

In summary, while Argo and Fleet both offer solutions for managing applications and clusters in Kubernetes, Argo provides more flexibility, focuses on GitOps workflows, and has a larger community and ecosystem. On the other hand, Fleet follows a more standardized approach, is focused on cluster management, and is still evolving with a smaller but growing community.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Argo
Pros of Fleet
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 2
    Autosinchronize the changes to deploy
  • 1
    Online service, no need to install anything
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Argo?

    Argo is an open source container-native workflow engine for getting work done on Kubernetes. Argo is implemented as a Kubernetes CRD (Custom Resource Definition).

    What is Fleet?

    Fleet is a low-level cluster engine that feels like a distributed init system. With fleet, you can treat your CoreOS cluster as if it shared a single init system.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Argo?
    What companies use Fleet?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Argo or Fleet.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Argo?
    What tools integrate with Fleet?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    PythonDockerKubernetes+14
    12
    2603
    DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
    18
    5968
    What are some alternatives to Argo and Fleet?
    Airflow
    Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.
    Flux
    Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    Spinnaker
    Created at Netflix, it has been battle-tested in production by hundreds of teams over millions of deployments. It combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers.
    Kubeflow
    The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.
    See all alternatives